Windows Powershell / Command line access
Windows Powershell / Command line access requires the following.
Microsoft Windows Powershell 3.0 or above is required. Older operating systems (for example Windows Server 2008 R2) require an upgrade of the Windows Management Framework in order to access Spotlight from the command line. Download Windows Management Framework 3.0
For commands where user / password details are required ensure the user is a member of the Spotlight Diagnostic User Groups Spotlight Diagnostic Administrators or Spotlight Diagnostic Users. Where there are multiple Spotlight Diagnostic Servers in a federation the user is required to be a member of Spotlight Diagnostic Administrators or Spotlight Diagnostic Users for all Spotlight Diagnostic Servers in the federation.
Access Spotlight from Windows Powershell / the command line
|From Windows Powershell, enter command: **Import-DS||Add-DS -PassThru**.|
Tip: Enter command get-dS to verify the Spotlight Diagnostic Server has been imported correctly.
Tip: In some special situations or for some platforms, if Import-DS does not work for you then open the Console directory in the Spotlight Client installation directory (usually C:\Program Files (x86)\Quest Software\Spotlight Enterprise). Right click the file ds-cli.cmd and select Open to open the command prompt.
Command Spotlight from Windows Powershell / the command line
- Basic commands
- Windows Powershell / Command line parameters
- Add a list of connections
- Remove many connections
- Add a planned outage schedule
- Alarm commands
- Manage access to Spotlight connections
Clubhouse in the spotlight after user records posted online
Reports of another trove of scraped user data add to the recent woes of popular social media platforms
It seems that threat actors are increasingly setting their sights on extracting vast amounts of user data from social media platforms. The cascade of incidents started off last week with a data leak impacting more than half a billion Facebook users and was followed by another incident where personal information belonging to a similar number of LinkedIn users also ended up for sale on a hacking forum. Barely a few days have passed and Clubhouse, the popular audio-only social media platform, has experienced a sort of incident of its own.
According to Cybernews, which broke the latest story, an SQL database containing scraped personal data of 1.3 million Clubhouse users is up for grabs on a hacker forum. The records include user IDs, names, usernames, social media handles, photo URLs, account creation dates, and information about who nominated the user to the app.
However, Clubhouse said that the data is public and anyone can access it through its API. Additionally, most of the information is freely viewable by other users of the app.
This is misleading and false. Clubhouse has not been breached or hacked. The data referred to is all public profile information from our app, which anyone can access via the app or our API. https://t.co/I1OfPyc0Bo
— Clubhouse (@joinClubhouse) April 11, 2021
In the meantime, some well-regarded security experts have also joined the fray and contend that the incident is nowhere near as grave as portrayed by some media.
The Clubhouse breach story is nonsense. It’s like saying Google hacked Twitter as they store people’s Twitter usernames and follower counts. https://t.co/9Jpdo2uq1v
— Kevin Beaumont (@GossiTheDog) April 11, 2021
Regardless, it’s not a stretch to think that a motivated cybercriminal could use the harvested information in combination with data from other incidents in order to create a comprehensive portrait of potential victims. This could be then used to carry out targeted phishing campaigns and social engineering attacks; in some cases, the data could even be used to carry out identity theft.
There are ways for users to mitigate the chances of falling victim to enterprising cybercriminals. First of all, you should be wary of any unsolicited message you may receive from strangers on your linked social media accounts. Use strong and unique passwords as well as turn on multi-factor authentication wherever available, preferably with a hardware token or a mobile app. It’s also worth considering what kind of information you share on a publicly searchable profile, since oversharing can have serious consequences.
Clubhouse also made headlines in February, when it emerged that an unidentified user had found a way to stream audio feeds from the app’s chat rooms to a third-party website. In addition, ESET researchers recently found that threat actors have also been trying to piggyback off the platform’s sudden success by spewing out malware that poses as the (still non-existent) official Android version of Clubhouse and aims to steal users’ login information for various online services.
Trump’s positive coronavirus test puts spotlight on presidential line of succession — here’s a primer
Markets appeared rattled early Friday after President Donald Trump said he had tested positive for the coronavirus causing the disease COVID-19 as traders wonder what’s next and put a spotlight on the presidential line of succession. Trump tweeted that he and first lady Melania Trump are starting their “quarantine and recovery process.”
Here is a primer on the presidential line of succession and whether a presidential candidate could be replaced on the ballot when an Election Day lies just a month in the future.
Related:Trump being taken to Walter Reed Medical Center for evaluation after diagnosis
Also read:Trump ‘fatigued but in good spirits,’ White House doctor says
If a president, Trump in this case, can no longer serve as president for health reasons, the vice president, with Trump’s No. 2 being Mike Pence, would take the reins and presumably quickly pick a fellow partisan to serve as his vice president, just as Gerald Ford succeeded Richard Nixon upon the Republican president’s resignation and tapped Nelson Rockefeller.
Pence tested negative for the disease caused by the coronavirus on Friday morning and “remains in good health and wishes the Trumps well in their recovery,” his press secretary said on Twitter.
But if Pence, a former Indiana governor, ended up becoming somehow not available to act as commander-in-chief, the line of succession would get into the weeds a little.
Next in line is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the California Democrat, followed by the Senate’s most senior Republican, Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, who is that chamber’s president pro tempore.
After that, members of the Cabinet are tapped, starting with the secretary of state (currently Mike Pompeo), followed by the Treasury secretary (Steven Mnuchin), defense secretary (Mark Esper), the attorney general (Bill Barr) and the interior secretary (David Bernhardt).
Related:Mnuchin tested negative for coronavirus Friday morning, Treasury says
And see:Trump tested positive for coronavirus — here’s everything we know so far
A temporary transfer of power to the vice president is also possible. That happened in 2007 for a couple of hours, when former President George W. Bush was anesthetized for a routine colonoscopy and former Vice President Dick Cheney was acting president.
In terms of how the Nov. 3 election could change, election-law expert Rick Hasen said in a blog post overnight that “as a matter of national importance we need to ask what would happen if one of the presidential candidates died or became incapacitated” before Election Day. He said “ballots are already out and millions of people have already voted,” so it “seems impossible” to put a new name on the ballot.
“While things are not certain, what’s most likely [is] that the election would take place on time with the deceased or incapacitated candidate’s name on the ballot, and then there would be a question [as to whether] legislatures would allow presidential electors of each state to vote for someone other than the deceased candidate,” wrote Hasen, a professor of law and political science at the University of California, Irvine.
“This could lead to a whole lot of mischief if, say, the Pennsylvania Republican legislature tried, over the Democratic governor’s objection, to appoint electors to vote for Pence (if it were Trump who could no longer be a candidate) despite a vote [by] the people of Pennsylvania for Biden over Trump.”
These new dimensions of uncertainty, as well as disappointment over the September nonfarm-payrolls report, put pressure on the U.S. stock market SPX, +0.08% DJIA, +0.19%, which closed with losses on Friday.
Related:Dow sinks over 400 points as Trump contracts coronavirus and jobs report disappoints
And see:Markets, and analysts, seem unsure how to react to jarring news Trump has COVID-19
“There would be a ton of uncertainty if we faced such a tragedy as a presidential candidate dying during this period,” Hasen said.
Spotlight corporate offices | headquarters | Phone | Address
Spotlight AustraliaAverage rating: 26 reviews
Aug 6, 2020
by Helen on Spotlight Australia
I tried to call Spotlight in Midland six times today twice I got through and was put through to the appropriate department and then was put on hold for 15 minutes before I got cut off. Three times I did get through and I was put on hold without actually speaking to anybody and then got cut off again after at least 15 minutes on hold,and on the six time I asked to speak to the manager whose name was Rebecca. She was extremely rude not at all interested in the fact that I was complaining about the poor service and not being able to get through all the time. She She accused me of abusing her instead of listening to my complaint and trying to resolve it. I think this service is an absolute disgrace. The manager of that store does not have the skills to be a manager and the store definitely needs an overhaul and review of it’s customer service abilities.
Aug 6, 2020
by Halina on Spotlight Australia
Absolutely appalling- a so called VIP member for 11 yrs, told I don’t spend enough to get a catalogue mailout, but I need a coupon to get the so called specials atm , customer service told me I have to wait 24 hrs to find out why, sending letter to CEO
Spotlight Headquarters Info
You can find the corporate head office address and headquarters in Melbourne VIC 3205. Most of the operations handled from this Spotlight Australia corporate headquarter.
- Address: Spotlight headquarters is completely transparent when it comes to contact information and location of the Spotlight. You can address any letters to this corporate headquarters office to:
111 Cecil St, South Melbourne VIC 3205, Australia
- Phone Number: Call +61 1300 305 405 to reach someone at Spotlight headquarters. As soon as you speak with a representative, you should have a fair solution to your problem that is relatively fast, You can contact during Monday to Friday: 9:00 am – 5:00 pm and Saturday to Sunday: Closed. We suspect the corporate office is also open during these times.
- Email: As an alternative, you can email Spotlight at [email protected] that may help spread the word about your problem.
- Website: You can use their website www.Spotlight.com.au and contact any department for general help. there is no dedicated website for Spotlight headquarters.
Spotlight Headquarters Executive Team
Meet the team providing strong leadership to Spotlight headquarters. Below are some executive team members name of Spotlight corporate head office Australia.
- Rob DeDominicis : Ceo and Managing Director
Spotlight corporate office addresses
|Spotlight (Australia)||111 Cecil St, South Melbourne VIC 3205, Australia|
Also Read : Ebay Australia Headquarters Info
Definition of Spotlight by Merriam-Websterspot·light | \ ˈspät-ˌlīt \
1a : a projected spot of light used to illuminate brilliantly a person, object, or group on a stage
b : public notice or attention held the political spotlight
2a : a light designed to direct a narrow intense beam of light on a small area
b : something that illuminates brilliantly
spotlighted or spotlit; spotlighting
Spotlight on Education: Why Do Students Like Online Learning?
Why do students flock to the online learning environment? With over 4 million students are enrolled in online schools and universities (and that number is growing 30% per year), there are many compelling arguments for attending a cyber classroom.
- 1. Students can “attend” a course at anytime, from anywhere. This means that parents can attend to their children, then sit down to class; working students can attend classes no matter what their work schedule might be, folks that travel for business or pleasure can attend class from anywhere in the world that has internet access.
- 2. Online learning enables student-centered teaching approaches. Every student has their own way of learning that works best for them. Some learn visually others do better when they “learn by doing.”
- 3. Course material is accessible 24 hours a day 7 days a week. Students have the ability to read and re read lectures, discussions, explanations and comments. Often spoken material in the classroom passes students by due to a number of distractions, missed classes, tiredness or boredom.
- 4. In an online environment, attendance to class is only evident if the student actually participates in classroom discussion. This increases student interaction and the diversity of opinion, because everyone gets a say, not just the most talkative.
- 5. Online instructors come with practical knowledge and may be from any location across the globe. This allows students to be exposed to knowledge that can’t be learned in books and see how class concepts are applied in real business situations.
- 6. Using the internet to attend class, research information and communication with other students teaches skills in using technologies that will be critical to workers in the 21st century business community that works with colleagues globally and across time zones.
- 7. Participating online is much less intimidating than “in the classroom.” Anonymity provides students a level playing field undisturbed by bias caused by seating arrangement, gender, race and age. Students can also think longer about what they want to say and add their comments when ready. In a traditional class room, the conversation could have gone way past the point where the student wants to comment.
- 8. Because online institutions often offer “chat rooms” for informal conversation between students, where student bios and non class discussions can take place, there appears to be a increased bonding and camaraderie over traditional class environments.
- 9. The online environment makes instructors more approachable. Students can talk openly with their teachers through online chats, email and in newsgroup discussions, without waiting for office hours that may not be convenient. This option for communication provides enhanced contact between instructors and students.
- 10. Online course development allows for a broad spectrum of content. Students can access the school’s library from their PC’s for research articles, ebook content and other material without worries that the material is already “checked out.”
- 11. Students often feel that they can actually listen to the comments made by other students. Because everyone gets a chance to contribute, students are less irritated with those that “over contribute” and can ask for clarification of any comments that are unclear.
- 12. Over 75% of colleges and universities in the U.S. offer online degree programs, with online degrees as respected as “on the ground” degrees. (Lewis)
- 13. Online classrooms also facilitate team learning by providing chatrooms and newsgroups for meetings and joint work. This eliminates the problems of mismatched schedules, finding a meeting location and distributing work for review between meetings.
- 14. Students often comment that online learning lets them attend class when fully awake and attend in increments of convenient time block, rather than rigid 2 or 4 hour stretches once or twice a week.
- 15. Because there are no geographic barriers to online learning, students can find a diversity of course material that may not be available to them where they live or work. This is especially true for professional training such as medical billing training or purchasing training and for students in remote rural areas that cannot support college or vocational training centers.
While “brick and mortar” institutions will never be eliminated, it’s easy to see why a growing number of people are attending class in the cyber world. They may be reasons of accessibility, flexibility or quality, all compelling and contributing to the attractiveness of this mode of learning.
Information Provided by WorldWideLearn.
Return to Index
For reprint and licensing requests for this article, CLICK HERE.
Bad ballot design keeps party insiders in power
Editor’s note: This coverage is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan reporting project covering local election integrity and voting access. The article is available for reprint under the terms of Votebeat’s republishing policy.
More than a month after the election, controversy about fair voting practices still dominates the political conversation, as President Donald Trump and his allies continue their baseless quest to find what he claims are rigged ballots.
Ironically, every year in New Jersey, voters in the state’s primary elections find themselves confronted with confusing, poorly designed ballots that while not technically rigged are often slanted to the benefit of political insiders and local party bosses.
It’s called the “party line.”
“In most of our counties, the primary ballot is a stacked deck,” said Brandon McKoy, the chief executive at New Jersey Policy Perspective, a nonpartisan think tank. “The line protects the status quo in power, not the average taxpayer.”
McKoy’s organization is one of about a dozen progressive groups that have banded together to attempt to reform New Jersey’s party-driven electoral system, which invests power in a handful of local kingmakers who have huge influence over fundraising, award of public contracts and official endorsement of primary candidates.
The group, under the leadership of the nonprofit Good Government Coalition of New Jersey, has marshaled an array of evidence showing how the party line damages democracy.
They point out that New Jersey is the only state in the nation that allows political parties to organize and design primary ballots. The result is that favored candidates win prominent positions that stand out to the voters, while other candidates are condemned to “ballot Siberia” — a remote column along with other unfavored candidates.
Studies cited by the group show that the system helps give incumbents a powerful lock on office: No state legislator seeking reelection has been defeated in a primary since 2009. No congressional incumbent from New Jersey has lost a primary in the past half-century, even as primary challengers unseated dozens of incumbents in other states during the same time.
Three decades of party-line power
A 75-page study published earlier this year in the Rutgers University Law Review found that the party-line system has dominated New Jersey politics for at least three decades, driven by powerful local bosses who foster bad ballot design and voter confusion to promote narrow interests of the party.
The study’s author, Brett Pugach, a leading election lawyer who in 2016 served as New Jersey general counsel to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign, wrote that part of the problem stems from state laws that allow county committees to amass large sums of money.
Getting elected, Pugach wrote, becomes a matter of staying close to the county chairman and his pot of money.
“The alternative is that they (candidates) risk not receiving the endorsement of the county committee and … the financial benefits that will surely accompany it,” he found. “Anything short of unwavering support could amount to political suicide.”
Kate Delaney, a teacher from Collingswood who in 2019 led an insurgent group of candidates to win election to the Camden County Democratic Committee, says the party line remains a stubborn barrier to good government.
New Jersey’s pay-to-play culture, she said, revolves around the power of unelected political leaders to choose candidates who will vote to favor powerful donors and direct lucrative public contracts to other insiders.
Political machines are pricey
“It’s not about Republican or Democrat at all, it’s about money,” Delaney said. “It’s about who controls the contracts. And the taxpayers end up going into debt for goods and services that could probably be purchased cheaper — political machines are expensive.’’
Later this week, Delaney plans to officially announce her candidacy for mayor of Collingswood, a race in which she will have to challenge longtime incumbent Mayor James Maley in the party primary.
“It will be an uphill battle, but we did it once before,” she said.
In coming months, ahead of next year’s gubernatorial election, the reformers plan to press for a common-sense ballot design that lists candidates according to the office they are running for — not by the organization that endorsed them. They’ll be asking lawmakers and others to sign a “fair ballot resolution” to help protect New Jersey primaries against insider interest.
Voter confusion caused by poorly designed ballots, they say, routinely results in disenfranchisement.
In this year’s primary election, voter confusion caused by these ballots resulted in 32.4% of all Mercer County Democratic voters in the 4th Congressional District having their votes disqualified because they selected two congressional candidates, and 19% of all Atlantic County Democratic voters not voting for any U.S. Senate candidate.
Film In Spotlight (2015) description, content, trailers and much more about the film
Review of the film “In the Spotlight”
Early 2000s. The Boston Globe’s Special Investigations Department Spotlight is going through hard times: there have been no good cases for a long time, and the prospects are unclear, and even the recent change of publisher requires journalists to demonstrate their talents and the need to stay in the editorial office.Almost out of despair, one of the reporters grasps at the shaky, almost invisible thread of the scandalously hushed up in court fact of child abuse by a local priest, but his very first studies in this direction reveal a horrifying picture – the Boston diocese of the Catholic Church is teeming with pedophiles. It turns out to be very difficult to stir up the public – the victims do not want to remember the experience of violence and humiliation, the saints suspected of terrible sins refuse to comment, the church has an army of lawyers on the side of the church, and the institution of Catholicism itself is considered unshakable.However, journalists at the Boston newspaper are armed with the right to freedom of expression, and they are pushing for dire details to be released.
Still from the film “In the Spotlight”
While preparing for the role, Michael Keaton spent a long time unnoticed watching his prototype Walter Robinson. His immersion in the image was so deep that when he first met Robinson was amazed at how accurately Keaton reproduces his gestures and facial expressions
I really do not want to climb into the territory of political statements in assessing films, but analyzing Tom McCarthy’s film “In the Spotlight” from Russian realities, it is impossible not to touch upon the issues of freedom of speech, independence of the court and the real manifestation of the fourth estate.Today, the revolution shown in the picture in the head of the layman is impossible in principle, there is no tool or leverage to reveal dark secrets, and society, which has noticeably cooled down to any injustice in the last fifteen years, is hardly interested in high-quality journalism, yielding to pressure ” yellow press “. But it is all the more interesting to watch the plot of the tape – Boston was also not built immediately, and the pots in it were not burned by the gods at all.
Still from the film “In the Spotlight”
The Boston investigation is just part of a larger campaign that has exposed the deep decline in the morals of Catholic priests around the world, from faraway Australia to the very heart of the church – the Vatican
The genre of investigative journalism and, frankly, not the most attractive entertainment for readers of the paper press – people gradually lost interest in long editorial articles, analytics and expert assessment, it is much easier to read a summary in someone’s retelling or read theses on a topic of interest in social networks.Movies about journalists are even less spectacular than reading long articles. In short, the whole intrigue of In the Spotlight lies in the fact that the heroes are waiting for confirmation of their assumptions – they unsuccessfully try to talk witnesses, victims and rapists, they seek the publication of court decisions, they connect publicly available facts so as to weave a web into which they fall local bishop. And this is not done in a war, not in a building seized by terrorists, not under the threat of explosions or floods – several people sit in a glass office, surrounded by folders with papers, scribbling articles, knocking out Morse code on a computer keyboard with two fingers.Do you know what is the most spectacular “action scene” in such a picture? The way Mark Ruffalo’s hero crosses the road in the wrong place.
Still from the film “In the Spotlight”
And yet, the lover of good cinema “In the spotlight” rivets to the screen no worse than a spy thriller or a mystical horror. Than? A wealth of characters and a fascinating texture. The tape is based on real events, on facts from the life of the church, which the latter probably would like to hide deeper – and this means a lot.The writers did not even have to exaggerate, pedophilia and the concealment of the filth of Catholics flourished at that time around the world in such a magnificent color that sooner or later this abscess had to burst. And then the reporters come into battle. It is especially interesting to observe how Boston journalists compete with colleagues from other cities – the topic is being promoted quickly, you need to prepare an article, but also rely only on confirmed facts. This is not walking on the edge of a skyscraper roof, not stopping a bomb timer or jumping into the unknown, but a rather serious risk – reputational, corporate, and even human.
Still from the film “In the Spotlight”
Characters are the second important component of the picture, and they are not only superbly written, but also brilliantly played. Any actor on Michael Keaton’s crew could qualify for top acting awards, and it’s no surprise that the lead ensemble has already won prizes. Each hero is an individuality, each of his actions is a step forward, each thought is a breakthrough. For the entire editorial board of The Boston Globe, materials about molested priests became the main event in life.Yes, the investigation unfolded against the backdrop of the depression of the nation associated with the events of September 11, 2001. Yes, the change in ownership of the newspaper has had an impact. But these people did a just cause for the benefit of their fellow citizens, and the actors played the roles of real invisible heroes, those whose hands are done when justice is done when the courts, police and prosecutors are powerless. We can only dream of this so far.
An extremely specific but very inspiring spectacle presented by the director and the cast will surely be one of the triumphs of the forthcoming Academy Awards.However, even outside the awards, this work is impressive. First of all, the fact that a good movie does not have to burst with an abundance of special effects, a pen and a piece of paper are enough to rule the world.
From February 11 to the cinema.
Spotlight Watch Online
Investigative journalism based on true events starring Michael Keaton and Liv Schreiber. The 2016 Academy Award-winning film tells a story that happened in Boston in 2012.The Boston Globe newspaper publishes an article on numerous incidents of child abuse in the church. Spotlight journalists Mike Rezendes (Ruffalo) and Sasha Pfeiffer (McAdams), led by Walter Robinson (Keaton), are conducting a thorough investigation before telling the whole truth.
The film premiered at the 72nd Venice Film Festival in September 2015.
Alan J. Pakula’s Parallax Conspiracy and All the Presidential Men and Sidney Lumet’s Verdict and Television inspired Tom McCarthy on Spotlight.
There is no specific genre for investigative journalism in film, but these are very popular stories to represent in films. Over the past few years, “Zodiac”, “Own Man”, etc. have come out.
A classic example of such an investigation in film is All the President’s Men, which tells the story of two journalists Bob Woodward and Karl Bernstein, who published an article denouncing President Nixon that led to his resignation following the Watergate scandal.
In Spotlight inherits a form similar to films released in the 70s: a leisurely, eyewitness and victim interviews narrative that accelerates by the minute.
New Editor-in-Chief Marty Baron (Schreiber) joins the Boston Globe and invites the newspaper to tackle a sensitive and relevant topic. The fact is that the priest of the Boston church is accused of sexual abuse of children and they have an interview with the victim’s lawyer, Mr. Garabedian (Tucci).To reveal and get to the bottom of the truth, editor Baron invites the editor-in-chief of the Spotlight column Walter Robinson (Keaton) and his team, who always choose what to write about.
An article will be published in 2012, after the publication of which the cardinal of the Catholic Church will be fired, who knew about what was happening in his church, but did not take any action.
The script for the film was written by Tom McCarthy (Good Night and Good Luck) and Josh Singer (The First Man, Lie to Me) and is based on a true story.
The film won Academy Awards for Best Picture and Best Screenplay, and won a British BAFTA for Best Original Screenplay.
Reasons to Watch
▪ Academy Award Movie for Best Picture in 2016.
▪ The film features two Golden Globe winners, Stanley Tucci and Michael Keaton.
▪ The film is based on a true story in which the Boston Globe published an article in 2012.
▪ The only thing Michael Keaton feared in preparing for the role was his Boston accent. But after watching the video of the real Walter Robinson, he was surprised that he only had a slight Boston accent.
▪ Spotlight on first true-life film to win the Veritas Awards. The second film on the list was Spy Bridge (2015).
▪ Liv Schreiber starred in the TV series Ray Donovan, in which his character Ray, also from Boston, was also a victim of priestly violence.
▪ Second film in a row starring Michael Keaton to win an Academy Award. The first film was Birdman (2014).
▪ McCarthy and Singer finished writing in 2013. But he was included in the 2014 Blacklist of Unrealized Scenarios.
▪ Principal photography of the film began on September 24, 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts and continued in October in Hamilton, Ontario.
▪ The film shows only the events that led to the publication of the first Spotlight article, while the newspaper team continued to publish reports for the next two years.
▪ An investigation by journalists revealed that the church was aware of numerous cases of rape. Letters were found confirming this, and the church asked the families of the victims to remain silent about the crimes. Boston Globe reporters found that 90 priests in Boston were caught in similar crimes.
everyday issues and monotonous details – Rossiyskaya Gazeta
Indeed, the cast is impressive.Michael Keaton, Mark Ruffalo, Lev Schreiber, Rachel McAdams, Stanley Tucci and others really rightfully draw attention to Thomas McCarthy’s painting.
And it cannot be said that they do not live up to expectations – only, alas, the characters they got to gnashing teeth are stereotyped and boring. Although, it is likely that they correspond to prototypes. But that doesn’t make them any more interesting.
Spotlight is a story about a scandal involving the exposure of pedophile priests in the Catholic Church as a result of an investigation by journalists from a Boston newspaper.The story, which took place in the early 2000s, has since received a variety of artistic commentaries, ranging from John Michael McDonagh’s poignant Calvary to the brutally sarcastic episode in South Park.
The film by Thomas McCarthy can only be called a statement on this sensitive topic in the last place. There is neither the slightest deep analysis of the terrible phenomenon, nor any serious attempts to explain or comprehend the monstrous phenomenon that has been discovered all over the world. The story is focused on the investigation itself and the everyday life of the correspondents.
This is a typical “journalistic drama”, filmed according to the canons established by such films as “All the President’s Men” (1976) and many others. Most of them are not dynamic and fascinating, but the author of “The Station Keeper” surpassed them all in this. The viewer will have to follow the monotonous dialogues (most of which take place in the editorial office), in which everyday issues and monotonous details are discussed, without stopping for more than two hours.
If in the aforementioned classic film about the Watergate scandal all this was at the very least diluted with clarifications of the relationship between a couple of main characters performed by Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford, here you will be offered only insipid conversations of one-dimensional sensation seekers.Reasoning about the nature of evil at the level of “there it is, as it turns out,” definitely does not add content to the film.
And the degree of sensitivity of the journalists investigating the case is exhaustively illustrated by an episode where one of them arranges a hysterical full of pathos with calls to protect the world from inhuman geeks, which is actually covered by a mundane fear of missing out on an exclusive.
The main message of the picture is simple: evil is around us, and it can hide in anyone, even where it should not be in principle.This simple truth is stated in such a dull form that even those who could not be put to sleep by the Falling Game in the next hall run the risk of falling asleep at its show.
Subscribe to our channel in Telegram: https://telegram.me/cinemacracy
Spotlight: A film in which journalists work as lawyers
Jurisprudence and journalism have much more in common than you might think.At least, such a conclusion suggests itself after watching the film “In the Spotlight”, which recently received an Oscar as the best film of the year. Director Tom McCarthy’s deadpan drama follows the scrupulous and methodical way the Boston Globe investigates massive cases of sexual assault by Catholic priests. And then publishes the results of this investigation. Point.
The film begins in 2000, when the new chief editor Marty Baron (Liv Schreiber) came to the main Boston city newspaper, the Boston Globe.First, he instructs the Investigation Department “Spotlight”, which translates as “In the spotlight” or “Spotlight”, to get involved in the Catholic Church: the fact is that the newspaper has had 10 years of evidence of child abuse by Massachusetts priests … However, like many organizations in a very church-loyal city, it has been slow to shed light on an inconvenient truth. The baron is a new person in the city and, moreover, not a Catholic, but a Jew – the same mop who sweeps in a new way and does it surprisingly calmly, without banging his fist on the table and unnecessary emotions.
Soon, a team of six journalists and editors discovers that the smooth-running lawyer handling the cases of the victims (who counts in the hundreds) was settling all cases privately and paying the complainants compensation from the church, not forgetting his share. Another lawyer collects evidence and prepares to voice it at an open court hearing. According to him, there are documents showing that the church leadership is aware of the problem. But these documents are legally sealed, and the team of journalists must find a way to get them officially.The matter is further complicated by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001: all other plots fade into the background, and the highest clergy call from the screens to courage and calmness.
Ordinary sensationalism and indifference
The sensationalism of the material about pedophile priests and the shocking scope of the disaster in this film looks surprisingly common. Its creators have no easy answers to difficult moral questions. The two lawyers with whom the newspapermen communicate are also very revealing – at first they are clearly divided into “good” and “bad”.But then it turns out that the victims’ attorney, who dealt with issues out of court, did so not because his clients agreed to accept payments, but because they would have received much less in court.
The question of what a lawyer should do when he has to represent the interests of dishonest people is raised more than once. However, journalists will have to answer it. Their team is not working on a high-profile case of corruption or mutual guarantee, which promises trouble for everyone who touches the materials: in principle, journalists do not face any threats in the film.But they are struck by something else: the silence around the problem, the existence of which the public could not believe, was achieved by prosaic methods – an exchange of remarks at a charity evening, a handshake while playing golf, disapproving facial expressions or an expressive look. This is not a conspiracy, but rather, a massive psychological disorder invisible to the naked eye: “If a child is raised by the whole village, then in order to offend him, you need a whole village,” sums up one of the characters in the film.
There is a certain sense and nerve in the fact that just such a film, not distinguished by either brightness or fury, was named the best film of the year by the film academics. The entire team of journalists for the Boston newspaper, which served as prototypes for the heroes of the film (including Ben Bradley Jr., the son of a journalist who at one time unleashed the Watergate scandal and became the hero of the film “All the President’s Men” about the power of the printed word), is still in in fact – and one would like to hope that the same cannot be said about the heroes of their investigation.Despite the fact that the events referred to in the film took place before the dominance of the Internet, the work of these people to draw public attention to the most impartial issues gradually spilled over from daily print publications to other media, and all over the world: these are social networks and blogs, and documentaries on real events, and feature films with an impressive cast like this one.
Mark Ruffalo, who played the role of the most ardent reporter, is much better known to viewers for his roles in superhero films based on comics.Michael Keaton was nominated for an Oscar last year for his self-deprecating role as an actor in Birdman, famous for his role as a superhero and tormented by this burden. And “In the spotlight” neatly hints that superheroism also has a place in the workplace in the office – and for him it is absolutely not necessary to dress up in tight leotards or have supernatural abilities: you just need to do your job, that’s all.Read also
Case for Superman – Session Magazine
In the spotlight.Dir. Tom McCarthy, 2015
“Too many adjectives,” the editor-in-chief mutters, tracing another word in red pencil. Before him lies the “bomb”, a large and extremely scandalous material about the Boston diocese, child molestation and the cardinal covering his lost sheep. For half a year, a four-person investigation team had been preparing this article in the far basement of the editorial office. In a few hours, the publication will turn Boston, then a wave of articles will cover the world and, having reached the Vatican itself, will return to the authors with professional awards and golden statuettes.But this is all tomorrow, and today there are still too many adjectives, which means that you need to sit down again at your tired writing desk to make changes.
In July 2001, when Martin Baron, a man with a red pencil, appeared at the doorstep of the editorial office, he was received with the despondency of inevitability – as an outsider imposed by his superiors in distant New York is accepted. The Boston Globe , where he found himself, has been a respectable regional publication with a relatively progressive agenda throughout its century and a half history.She honored her own people, was afraid of strangers. And here is Baron. A tumbleweed careerist, a workaholic, scary to say, a Jew. What to do?
The conflict of this film, in which, of course, there are pedophiles, and priests, and a strong production plot, was announced not by a poster flashback at the very beginning of the film, where the police are discussing another criminal padre, but in an introductory conversation between the new editor-in-chief of Globe with Cardinal Bernard Lowe. “A city thrives only when its great institutions work hand in hand,” the holy father of the fourth estate authoritatively admonishes, presenting him with a handy paperback catechism.Love and friendship, respect and cooperation – so it is, of course, easier and more reliable, but Baron runs the risk of disobeying. After reading a column in his own newspaper about the next trial against the diocese, Baron lowers a boring task from the cycle “church and life” into the investigation department, tearing the four sharks away from fascinating research on the topic of defective special equipment and fraudulent police statistics.
Spotlight is full of magical production and life boredom.The viewer’s gaze calmly glides over the details of the recent past: the soft tones of journalistic shirts, coffee-scented carpet, frayed tables, a hot dog for lunch, a “Remember 9/11” magnet on the refrigerator of people who know that a notebook and pencil are more reliable than a voice recorder. The camera in the film remains calm to match the characters: it watches the turning of pages, telephone disputes, court hearings and, it seems, gets off the cart only once – when one of the journalists suddenly discovers a supposed shelter of pedophiles in the neighborhood, a mysterious house with dark windows.Rushing towards him, he runs out into the street, and the camera rushes after, plunging the audience into panic: with the same random drops of horror they diluted the atmosphere of a calm office investigation in “Zodiac” and “All presidential troops”. Anyone who watches In the Spotlight will remember these films. It’s on the surface. But there are also less obvious virtues.
Tom McCarthy’s film is not biased, for all its poster-like accuracy. Probably, here you can see that once its author performed a large journalistic role in the TV series “The Wire”, made by venerable journalists, and, apparently, he took something important out of work on that site.The “spotlight” is anti-clerical, but not anti-religious.