Future space tech water bottle: Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Futurepace Tech White Stainless Steel Thermos Water Bottle 20oz BPA Free Box

NASA-Enhanced Water Bottles Filter Water on the Go

NASA Technology

Thanks to NASA bscience missions, researchers are finding that water may be more plentiful in space than we previously believed. The Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite mission confirmed the presence of water on the Moon, and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has returned images suggesting the flow of briny water in parts of the Martian landscape. Now that the Curiosity rover has landed on the Red Planet, it will search for the presence of water beneath the rust-colored soil.

Even so, space is practically a desert, where every drop of water is precious for the human explorers who brave that harsh environment. Complex systems onboard the International Space Station (ISS) collect and recycle moisture using powerful filtration technology developed by NASA and its partners—technology that transforms even urine and sweat into potable water for the ISS crewmembers. These systems are a model for those needed to make trips to distant destinations like Mars.

Even travelers here on Earth are benefiting from one such NASA-derived filtration innovation—part of a product that conveniently provides pure water for everyone from the international adventurer to the weekend warrior.

Technology Transfer

Mohssen Ghiassi, an entrepreneur with more than 30 years of experience developing products for the travel industry, was seeking technology that would enable his latest idea: a water bottle that would utilize an advanced filtration system, one that could be taken around the world, designed specifically for travelers. In selecting an effective filtration media, Ghiassi ran up against the problem of flow rate; water passed through the filter too slowly to provide convenient purification for consumers on the go. Soon, however, Ghiassi’s research led him to a NASA-derived solution—NanoCeram.

NanoCeram originated at Sanford, Florida-based Argonide Corporation. In 2000, the company partnered with Johnson Space Center through the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, with the goal of advancing the company’s unique filtration media for use in recycling water in space. With NASA support, Argonide developed the NanoCeram water purification technology, an innovation that won an R&D 100 Award and a place in the Space Foundation’s Space Technology Hall of Fame.

In 2006, Argonide exclusively licensed the filtration media to Ahlstrom Corporation, an international manufacturer that began mass producing the media for applications in countries around the world. Through Ahlstrom, Ghiassi found the key to his new product.

“We started purchasing from Ahlstrom and developing our product around this particular material because it really is the heart of the product,” says Ghiassi. He founded ÖKO, headquartered in Greenbrae, California, to market his spinoff technology.

 

 

Benefits

The ÖKO water bottle employs two filters: a carbon filter and the NASA-derived media. The bottle itself is made of a thin-walled version of a material similar to that used in most food containers. By simply squeezing the bottle, the consumer forces water through the two-level filter system, resulting in instant purified water.

Ghiassi notes the ÖKO bottle’s NASA-enhanced filtration eliminates multiple contaminates, including disease-causing microbes such as cryptosporidium and E. coli.

The Ahlstrom material, he says, activates when in contact with water, creating an electro-adsorptive charge field that, in addition to the media’s two-micron-wide pores, traps particles as the water is forced through. In a layer less than a millimeter thick, a bacterium would have to navigate through about 400 pores—called the “tortuous path”— while eluding silver ions in the media that kill microbes.

Ghiassi makes it clear that, while the ÖKO bottle is broadly effective, it is not universally so—environmental conditions play a major role. “You can say a product is going to remove 99.99 percent of this or that, but what is the saturation of that contaminate in the water? What is the ambient temperature? What is the pressure you are applying to the bottle? All of those factors are unknowns,” Ghiassi explains.

Drawing on sources such as the United Nations and the UNICEF World Health Program Organization, ÖKO provides its customers with information on the effectiveness of its water bottle in various areas of the globe. This information allows travelers to assess when their ÖKO bottles provide sufficient purification and when additional measures may be needed. The bottle is currently rated effective in more than 120 countries.

Ghiassi says that the ÖKO water bottle is experiencing demand outside of the travel industry. Consumers are buying the product for camping, sports, biking, and for children to use at school. ÖKO has other innovations in the pipeline, including a campground unit that can also be filled from a lake or stream, and a flashlight attachment that converts the water bottle into a nightlight. The filtration material developed through the NASA partnership is the core enabler of all of these products.

“The materials that have been created for specific use by NASA are state of the art because of the extreme conditions they are subjected to when they come into use by NASA,” says Ghiassi. “They are superior to anything else out there.”

NanoCeram® is a registered trademark of Argonide Corporation.

The 10 Best Water Bottles for Travel in 2021

With features ranging from built-in filtration to enviable good looks, these reusable water bottles make it easy to ditch single-use plastic water bottles and stay hydrated when you’re on the go.

share this article

No matter where we travel, we never leave home without a reusable water bottle. And since every year brings new technological advances that help keep our beverages colder and hotter, our bottles lighter, and our water cleaner, there’s always a new one for us to try out. After extensive, hands-on testing of some of the newest bottles on the market, we’ve reviewed and found the 10 best—including a few time-tested favorites—for just about any water-related travel need. These are the best travel water bottles to pack on your next trip:

  1. Yeti Rambler
  2. EcoVessel Aspen
  3. Hydro Flask Wide Mouth 
  4. Klean Kanteen TKWide
  5. Bindle Slim
  6. Vapur Anti-Bottle
  7. Katadyn BeFree
  8. Lifestraw Go
  9. Larq Bottle
  10. Purist Collective Maker

Yeti Rambler

  • Highlights: Durable and keeps drinks cold for days
  • Buy Now: $50, yeti.com

The 36-ounce Yeti Rambler looks impressively beefy: Its very appearance promises to preserve your drink’s original temperature no matter what—and the Rambler makes good. Want to go backpacking for a few days and find an ice-studded bottle of lemonade when you return to your car? This is your vessel. We’ve successfully transported ice cream in this bottle (after chilling it with cold water).

As with many well-insulated bottles on the market, the Rambler is made with double-walled, food-grade stainless steel. But it’s tougher and hardier than most: You can drop this bottle from a first-floor balcony and find it undented from the fall. And unlike most double-walled bottles, which require hand washing, the Rambler is dishwasher safe.

The extra-wide opening is both a pro and a con: It means the lip won’t collide with your nose, but it does allow for a possible tsunami of drink should you sip in bumpy conditions. Wider (3.75 inches) and heavier (22 ounces) than most comparable bottles, the body is too big for most cars’ cupholders. But the simple screw-top lid is particularly comfortable to hold, in part because it accommodates three fingers, instead of one or two as other bottles do, and the rounded plastic doesn’t dig into your skin when the bottle is heavy with water.

EcoVessel Aspen

  • Highlights: The sleek and stylish solution for most travelers, most of the time
  • Buy Now: $32, ecovessel.com

The 25-ounce Aspen manages to pack impressive water-cooling properties into a streamlined shape. It slides easily into cupholders and the holsters on most totes and backpacks. But this bottle’s comparatively thin walls keep drinks cool (or hot, as you prefer) for an astonishingly long time: EcoVessel claims cold water and drinks will stay cold for 100 hours, making the EcoVessel Aspen one of the best water bottles for hot climates.

We haven’t fully tested that boast but can confirm that this bottle kept water icy for a full day, even in roastingly hot weather. 

That said, ice isn’t always easy to fit inside the relatively narrow, 1.5-inch opening—some larger cubes do get stuck. Once inside, though, they last a long time, thanks to a three-layer construction that sandwiches copper between two layers of stainless steel. It’s recyclable but also durable (with a 100-year warranty!), so you’re not likely to deal with this bottle’s end-of-life issues. Losing it is more likely—leaving some lucky finder to enjoy its sleek good looks.

Klean Kanteen TKWide

  • Highlights: Best for travelers who want to keep all their beverage options open
  • Buy Now: $21 (was $30), rei.com 

Sure, you can fill this 16-ounce bottle with water, and we do. But its four interchangeable lids make the new TKWide bottle from Klean Kanteen ready for anything. We like the Café Cap, which features a small opening perfect for sipping coffee that twists closed, saving you and your bag from spills. It also has a metal swing handle that makes it easy to tote along on hikes, but snaps to the side when you don’t need it. The Wide Straw Cap comes with a 10-millimeter, stainless steel–and-silicone straw that accommodates thicker beverages, like smoothies or frozen margaritas. 

The BPA-free, food-grade stainless steel bottle is insulated, keeping contents hot for up to 14 hours or iced up to 47 hours. It’s also treated with Klean Kanteen’s proprietary, chip-resistant Klean Coat finish and backed the brand’s lifetime “Strong as Steel” guarantee.

And Klean Kanteen’s commitment to sustainability goes beyond giving consumers an option to replace single-use plastic bottles. In April of 2020, Klean Kanteen announced that it is 100 percent carbon neutral in its manufacturing and delivery of products as well as Climate Neutral Certified.

Hydro Flask Wide Mouth

  • Highlights: The best water bottle for outdoor adventurers
  • Buy now: $32 (was $45), hydroflask.com

Hydro Flask has long been a favorite for outdoor enthusiasts because the brand’s bottles boast excellent insulation, feature a comfortable, flexible plastic swing handle, and come in a variety of sizes and bright colors—and some of its most coveted colors are on sale now.

Article continues below advertisement

Hydro Flask is having a rare sale (hint: it won’t be happening again soon) that sees vibrant colors like “spearmint,” “watermelon,” and “sunflower” marked down 30 percent, and in some special cases 50 percent off.

The bottles come in two sizes, a 21-ounce standard mouth bottle with a sport cap option, and a 32-ounce wide-mouth bottle with a straw lid option. And Hydro Flask’s double-wall insulation will keep your drinks temperature-stabilized for a full day’s hike—24 hours for ice-cold beverages and up to 12 hours for hot ones. 

Bindle Slim

  • Highlights: The stealth storage solution ideal for beaches and day hikes
  • Buy Now: $29 (was $40), amazon.com

You expect a water bottle to hold water, but because travelers tend to carry more than just that, the Bindle Bottle doubles as a wallet. Unscrew the bottom section of this vacuum-insulated vessel and you’ll find a small storage compartment.

It’s just big enough for a hotel key or a few bills, which makes it handy on the beach: You can swim while your valuables hang out in relative secrecy. The Bindle Bottle is also useful at the gym (you can stash your locker key in the bottle instead of a pocket, which many workout clothes lack).

It’s not, however, ideal for running. Even the new Bindle Slim, a tall, double-walled 20-ounce option that fits in most universal cupholders, is too large and bulky to carry while logging your morning miles. Short hikes are OK: The cap’s broad handle makes it comfortable to hold while walking.

The wide opening makes the Bindle Slim easy to fill and accommodates ice cubes and fruit chunks (for those who like infused drinks). The food-grade stainless steel ensures that no BPA or other suspicious chemicals contact your water. Its matte powder-coat finish even comes in multiple colors and a few patterns—which seems fitting for a bottle that can also serve as a handbag.

Vapur Anti-Bottle

  • Highlights: The collapsible water bottle alternative for people who pack light
  • Buy Now: $7 (was $12), rei.com

The Vapur Anti-Bottle is one of the best travel water bottles for planes and an efficiency expert’s dream. When full, the water pouch holds almost 24 ounces of liquid, but empty, it weighs a mere 2 ounces and occupies about as much space as a wallet. The cap has a built-in carabiner for latch-and-go ease, and the body’s three-ply, BPA-free plastic is pliable enough to fold up into the clip. But don’t let the flexibility fool you—this pouch is durable enough to resist leaks, regardless of how many times it’s been rolled, twisted, or shoved in a full backpack. The Anti-Bottle can also stand on its own when full (or half full, or anything but empty, really).

Refills are a breeze with a hard plastic wide mouth at the cap’s base, and a much narrower mouthpiece protected by a flip top makes for spill-free sipping. Active adventurers will appreciate the DrinkLink tube accessory that converts the Anti-Bottle into a hands-free hydration reservoir. This collapsible bottle alternative is dishwasher safe, so there’s no need to buy a special cleaning tool for the interior. It’s also freezable, meaning it can serve as an ice pack if necessary.

Katadyn BeFree

  • Highlights: The space-saving filter bottle for outdoor adventurers and germaphobes
  • Buy Now: $45, rei.com

When empty, this collapsible flask packs down to the size of an apple, yet it delivers huge benefits: Its drinking spout sits on top of a (replaceable) filter that effectively traps protozoa and other disease-causing organisms. That means you can fill the silicone flask from any suspicious source and immediately enjoy clean water wherever you are.

The hollow-fiber filter delivers a pleasingly fast flow that’s genuinely thirst-quenching during exercise. Whereas some filters (including the Lifestraw, below) limit the flow to smaller sips, the BeFree releases a big, mouth-filling gulp—which we appreciated on 14,000-foot Colorado peaks where exertion and altitude left us too breathless to work hard for small returns on water.

We’ve used the one-liter BeFree to drink from roadside streams, backcountry lakes, hillside springs, and airport bathrooms—and can report no resulting ill effects. And you can count on a cartridge to last for several trips: Each one filters 1,000 liters (says Katadyn) and replacements cost $25.

But the BeFree doesn’t filter out funky flavors. It’s designed to be ultra-light and compact, so there’s no carbon element to neutralize foul tastes or smells. The bottle’s squishy design has advantages (packability) and disadvantages (it can be clumsy to hold). Instead, the filter-as-you-sip system is perfect for trail running, backcountry trekking, long-haul flights (no need to trust the airplane’s grimy water tank!), and any trip where you’ll need plenty of water but don’t want to be burdened by surplus water weight.

Lifestraw Go

  • Highlights: The flip-straw filter bottle for off-the-beaten-path travelers
  • Buy Now: $53, amazon.com

Article continues below advertisement

The 22-ounce Lifestraw Go is one of the best water bottles with a filter. It looks like a basic plastic bottle with flip-spout lid, but the “straw” inside is actually a two-stage filter. Its hollow-fiber membrane traps bacteria, parasites, and even microplastics. Then, an activated carbon capsule neutralizes unpleasant flavors and odors.

Yes, you have to suck a bit harder on this mouthpiece than you would from an unfiltered straw. But you’ll hardly grow faint: The hollow-fiber technology delivers a speedier flow than most other filters.

Replacement cartridges cost $15, and since one filter treats 100 liters, that’s generally less than the cost of buying a similar amount of bottled water. The large, bottle-length filter also displaces a significant amount of liquid, so the 22-ounce capacity is misleading. With the filter inside, the Go holds more like 15 ounces.

The trade-off is convenience. The Go is super-handy for city and country travel—especially in places where the drinking water isn’t always trustworthy. It fits tidily into bottle pockets on backpacks and in cars’ cupholders, and the BPA-free plastic is thicker and tougher than most: Lifestraw builds each bottle for a long life of service. Promoting reusable plastics is just one part of the company’s sustainability program: Lifestraw also provides clean drinking water to needy communities. With each Go purchase, the company provides one child with a year’s worth of water.

Larq Bottle

  • Highlights: The self-purifying bottle that makes clean water elegant
  • Buy Now: $95, livelarq.com

The 17-ounce Larq Bottle is expensive, but your money buys you a lot—including a germ-free water bottle. It’s not always easy to remember to wash your water bottle while traveling, but the Larq does it for you. The bottle’s cap is fitted with an ultraviolet light that disrupts the DNA in bacteria and viruses, rendering them unable to reproduce (which is how they cause diseases). And not only does the UV light kill waterborne microorganisms, but it also does so regularly, by automatically firing the UV beam every two hours to kill germs that may have been introduced from your mouth or a questionable water source.

Unlike UV pens, the Larq doesn’t use mercury, which causes environmental problems when it’s tossed into landfills. Plus, the Larq’s UV bulb has more stamina, lasting 40 times longer than mercury-based technology (according to Larq).

The bottle also uses a rechargeable lithium polymer battery that lasts one to two months on a single charge. Pressing the top of the cap activates the light: Tap once for normal purification, or twice for “adventure mode,” which is useful when you suspect your water may be loaded with harmful microorganisms.

Even if you never refill it with untreated water, the Larq is an attractive bottle that uses double-walled stainless steel construction to keep beverages cold for 24 hours or hot for 12. And if it also self-cleans between proper washes? That’s priceless.

Purist Collective Maker

  • Highlights: A lightweight glass water bottle that looks and insulates like a stainless steel one
  • Buy Now: $40, puristcollective.com

Glass bottles are great at repelling flavors and odors, which makes them particularly versatile: You can switch among coffee, water, and wine without any whiff of the previous beverage infiltrating the next. And unlike some plastics and metals, glass doesn’t leach chemicals into your drink.

But glass is heavy. Most glass water bottles (like the silicone-wrapped ones made by Lifefactory) might be great for home but feel too burdensome for travel.

Purist Collective solves this problem by lining its high-quality, surgical-grade stainless steel bottles with an ultra-thin layer of nonporous glass. We filled the Maker with coffee and cream in the morning, then refilled it with water—and discerned no java aftertaste.

The glass veneer is so thin that the Purist weighs no more than other double-walled metal bottles, so it’s easy to tote around all day.

The three bottle models come with basic screw-top caps with carrying loops, but additional caps can be purchased, including a flip-top and a leakproof one that will rotate to let you adjust the flow and sip from anywhere around the top. 

Even better than the clean, modernist design is the give-back program: Purist Collective partners with a network of social and environmental nonprofits, encouraging collaboration among the organizations, promoting their good work, and contributing financially to their efforts. So this good-looking bottle does good, too.

This article originally appeared online in November 2018; it was updated on May 6, 2020, and March 2, 2021, to reflect current information. 

Products we write about are independently vetted and recommended by our editors. AFAR may earn a commission if you buy through our links, which helps support our independent publication.

>>Next: Why I’m Stocking Up on These Perfect Insulated Travel Mugs

Best water bottle 2021 – CNN Underscored

(CNN) —  

The reusable water bottle trend is at an all-time high (even becoming something of a status symbol). With an endless stream of bottles — at different sizes, made from various materials and carrying numerous technological claims — flowing into the market, it’s easy to get lost in the options. It’s also easy to wind up shelling out $40+ for a bottle that does the job no better than one half the cost.

So to determine which bottles are truly worth their price tag, we culled thousands of insulated water bottles down to 16 contenders, after reading through reviews and browsing best-selling bottles across the internet. We then put them through a litany of tests to determine which is best. (For more on our testing process, scroll down.) After two months of testing and a whole lotta water, we were able to narrow down our picks to the three standouts below; we’re confident you’ll find the one that’s best for you and be assured you’re getting your money’s worth.

We found the Healthy Human Curve to be the best overall insulated water bottle. It performed surprisingly well across our most important testing criteria — performance, durability and portability — all at a reasonable price tag.

Our runner-up pick is the 26-ounce Yeti Rambler. It’s a sturdy, customizable bottle that performed slightly better than the Healthy Human Curve in thermoregulation, but fell a bit short overall, especially considering the significant difference in price ($39.99 versus $24.99).

If keeping your drinks the hottest or coldest for the longest amount of time is most important to you, then the S’well bottle should be your go-to, as it performed the best in our thermoregulation tests.

Best Overall: Healthy Human Curve 21 ounces ($24.99; amazon.com)

Healthy Human Curve 21-ounce water bottle

Why we love it in a sentence: The Healthy Human Curve’s ability to keep water cold and its exceptional durability — mixed with its relatively low price — makes it the best choice in the world of insulated water bottles.

The Healthy Human Curve scored the highest overall across our testing categories, and even earned the top spot in durability. After dropping the Healthy Human three times from five feet above concrete on its bottom as well as on its lid, the bottle barely showed signs of abuse, aside from some paint chipping on the bottom. It was one of the only contenders that didn’t transform into wobbly vessels after the drops. Coming in at 21 ounces, its success during the drop test may have been due to it being one of the lighter options, but the 26-ounce Yeti and other smaller bottles we tested still couldn’t live up to the Curve.

Healthy Human also does a solid — though not amazing — job with thermoregulation. In cold-water testing, the temperature dropped 10.1 degrees Fahrenheit over a full 24-hour stretch, which was a bit above the average in our testing pool. The water was still cool and refreshing to drink, however, and we’re confident saying that most people will be satisfied with its ability to keep liquids cold throughout the day.

The bottle fared less well with hot water. It dropped 73.7 degrees Fahrenheit after a 12-hour stretch, ranking slightly below average. So if you’re looking for a bottle that will also do well with hot beverages, you might want to consider another option.

In terms of design, the Healthy Human Curve has what can be described as love-it-or-hate-it curves. Because of this nuanced look, we didn’t score it terribly high for design, but it was incredibly easy to hold. It also comes in 17 different color options, so you do have some aesthetic choice. If the flagship bottle’s curves aren’t your thing, Healthy Human offers a simpler design in the Stein bottle, but keep in mind we didn’t test that model.

The Healthy Human Curve also comes in recyclable packaging, which is nice for those motivated to buy a reusable bottle to reduce plastic waste.

While a dark horse in this race, we can confidently say that the Healthy Human Curve is the best insulated water bottle on the market, especially for its price.

If you want to know more about the Healthy Human Curve and get more insight about how it did in our testing process, read our full review here.

Runner-Up: Yeti Rambler 26 ounces ($39.99; yeti.com)

Yeti Rambler 26-ounce bottle

Why we love it in a sentence: If you don’t mind paying more for a bigger mouth and customizable options, you get top quality with a Yeti.

The Yeti Rambler came just one point short of the Healthy Human in our testing, but its price is considerably higher. We’re still comfortable recommending it as another top option, especially for those who want more lids and customizations to choose from.

The Rambler held up better than most of the bottles we tested in our drop tests and had solid thermoregulation results, actually beating our top choice in keeping water cold and hot. We rated the 26-ounce Rambler higher than the 36-ounce one because it’s skinnier and easier to hold.

In addition to its stellar technical abilities, another great feature is the Yeti’s ultra-wide mouth. You’ll never have trouble filling it with ice, and washing it is much easier than most others (though we still recommend getting a bottle brush — it makes a world of difference). The downside to that huge mouth is it’s difficult to drink out of quickly without splashing water on your face. That cost the Yeti some points in our testing, and knocked our tester’s pride a little bit when he came out of the drinkability test with a soaked shirt.

Thankfully, Yeti offers tons of lids that fit all their bottles, including a straw lid and a chug cap for $12.99 extra, solving the splash problem. Our favorite pairing is the 26-ounce Rambler with a straw lid, though that brings the grand total up to $52.98.

You can also customize your Yeti with engravings of your name, your company’s logo, or even a design from a National Park for up to $10 extra.

Yeti is considerably pricier than the Healthy Human, coming in at a $39.99 base price, and upwards of $50 with customizations. But if you love the different lid options, always remember the family trip to Yosemite or prefer a more standard design, it’s a great choice.

If you want to know more about what we think of the Yeti Rambler, check out our full review.

Best for holding temperature: S’well 25 ounces ($45; swell.com)

S’well 25-ounce water bottle

Why we love it in a sentence: Though we had issues with the small mouth and lack of durability, the S’well is the best option for keeping your drinks hot or cold for the longest time.

The S’well bottle really set the standard for thermoregulation, outperforming the rest of the bottles in all of our temperature tests. Over a 24-hour period, cold water (without ice) only rose 7.1 degrees Fahrenheit; after 12 hours, nearly boiling water dropped a measly 43.1 degrees. That might sound like a big drop, but the next-closest bottle dropped 54 degrees.

Though it dominated in temperature, S’well’s downsides are its small mouth and lack of durability. The small opening makes it tough to clean, and not all ice cubes fit (the ones that do, you’ll have to drop in one at a time). Plus, after drop tests, it got so banged up that it wouldn’t stand up straight — particularly disappointing given its $45 price tag.

For some, the real selling point of the S’well is its many interesting design choices, like teakwood and geode rose. If you want a bottle that looks like marble or has a photo of the turtles you’re trying to save, then the S’well bottle is for you. And even if you’re less enamored with the design options, the amazing thermoregulation makes the S’well a good choice — so long as you don’t drop your bottle often.

If you’re considering a S’well bottle, make sure to read our full review for everything you need to know before you buy.

We tested these water bottles to make sure they meet the demands of everyday use. That meant testing how long they keep water cold, how long they keep water hot, and how they fare during a drop, both on their body and their lid.

Here’s a breakdown of what we tested and how we did it:

  • Hot water test: We poured water just after it had finished boiling (starting temps all measured within a few degrees of each other; ranging from 202.4 and 206) into each of the bottles and measured the temperature with a liquid thermometer immediately after the pour, then after 6 hours and 12 hours.
  • Cold water test: We poured tap water from a sink on its coldest setting directly into the bottles and measured the temperature (starting temps all measured within 1.4 degrees of each other; ranging from 47.5 to 48.9) with a liquid thermometer immediately after the pour, then after 12 hours and 24 hours.
  • Drinkability: We drank from the bottles’ standard caps both while standing still and walking, noting how prone each bottle was to spilling and splashing.
  • Leak test: We shook the bottles, held them upside down and threw them in a backpack for a commute to see if any water leaked.
  • Drop test: We dropped each bottle three times from five feet above concrete on its lid and three times from five feet above concrete on its body. We noted if the bottle was still usable (if the insulation or lid broke), then assessed the amount of dents and other damage.
  • Cleanliness: We tried to clean each bottle with a normal sponge, then with a bottle brush. In this test, we also considered how quickly we could add ice to the bottle.
  • Weight: We weighed each empty bottle in pounds on a food scale.
  • Carrying options: We noted any loops on the bottles, how many average-sized fingers fit inside and how comfortable it was to hold.
  • Grip: We felt the paint on each of the bottles and ordered them from least grippy to most.

We split our testing process into a few different categories to rate each bottle. We weighted thermoregulation and durability heavier than other categories (such as color options) because most of all we wanted to identify sturdy products that do their job for as long as possible.

Under performance, for a total of 60 points we had ratings for both hot and cold thermoregulation, drinkability and the leak test. Durability, worth 50 points, contained the drop tests for both the lid and the body, plus ease of cleaning. Design and aesthetics was worth 15 points, comprising the number of color options, general look and customizability. For portability, worth 20 points, we measured the weight, size, carrying options and the grip of each bottle. And to reach our grand total of 155, we set aside 5 points for any X factors and 5 points if the bottle had a lifetime warranty.

Bottles all got a rating for each test under each category, then we added up those numbers for a total score. We then layered price consideration into the equation to determine the best bottle at the best price.

With our favorites out of the way, here are the other bottles we looked at in our testing pool.

CamelBak Chute Mag ($36; camelbak.com)

This bottle performed quite well, especially with thermoregulation. The lid has a little magnet so it doesn’t hit you in the face while you drink. Its biggest downside: The cap broke off when we dropped it.

CamelBak Carry Cap ($36; camelbak.com)

If you’re considering CamelBak, go with the Chute Mag over the Carry Cap. The lid on the Carry Cap has a big loop, which is nice to hold, but it snapped off pretty easily during the drops.

Hydro Flask Wide Mouth ($44.95; hydroflask.com)

It’s a great looking bottle, but its performance just wasn’t on par with many of the other bottles. The biggest warning we’d give is not to drop it on the lid because it will pop right off and spill water everywhere. The first time this happened we thought it could be a faulty lid, but after a second one had the same problem, we decided to pin it on poor design.

Hydro Flask Standard Mouth ($34.95; hydroflask.com)

The Standard performed equally if not better than the Wide. Plus, it’s smaller, which means less weight to carry around. You can’t pour ice in as fast, but if you’re looking for a Hydro Flask in particular, go with the standard. Just be careful about drops. After our tests it got so damaged it lost its insulation abilities.

Klean Kanteen Classic ($29; amazon.com)

Klean Kanteen had stellar performances with thermoregulation, coming in with the second-highest total performance points. The biggest downsides were the small mouth (with a weirdly tiny lid), and the fact that the body got so damaged it caused the insulation technology to fail.

Klean Kanteen TKWide ($39.99; amazon.com)

The wide-mouth version of Klean Kanteen solves the small-mouth problem on the original bottle, touting a large lid and what seems like a sturdier body. It performed amazingly in the cold-water test, coming in second behind the S’well, but didn’t do well with hot water, which brought down its score. If you want a Klean Kanteen, we recommend this one with the TKWide chug cap.

Miir Bottle ($29.95; miir.com)

The Miir also did well in thermoregulation, outdoing both the Yeti and Sigg. It lost a lot of points during the drop test, during which the lid broke on the first drop. We didn’t test wide-mouth Miir bottles, only the standard. If you’re careful, Miir is a great option for a smaller, portable bottle.

SIGG Hot and Cold ONE Thermo Flask ($31.84; amazon.com)

This bottle performed well during the temperature tests, just about matching the Yeti Rambler. It’s a good-looking bottle featuring a lid with a locking mechanism and a built-in tea filter. Where it really fell apart was when we dropped it on that lid. It broke on the first drop. You can normally order replacement lids (though they’re out of stock now), but compared to the other bottles it just wasn’t sturdy enough.

Snow Peak Kanpai Bottle ($79.95; amazon.com)

This bottle is beautiful, scoring the highest in pure design. But it’s also expensive and scored the lowest in our testing, especially in thermoregulation, where it had the third worst score after the Takeyas. The lid shattered on the drop test.

Stanley Easy Clean ($30; amazon.com)

This bottle performed rather well in keeping water cold, but not nearly as well with hot water. The lid also fared really well during the drops, but the body got large dents on the bottom. What brought its score down were the little things: not as many sizes, lids or color options, it was on the heavier side, and it wasn’t as easy to carry.

Takeya Standard ($29.99; amazon.com)

The Takeya bottle underperformed in our most important test: thermoregulation. It scored the lowest in our pool in the performance category. Their caps feature a nifty little spout for fast drinking that unscrews to reveal a wide mouth, but it just wasn’t enough to overcome the poor insulation.

Takeya Active ($34.99; amazon.com)

The Active is basically the same as the Takeya Standard, with a few nice improvements. Most notably is the rubber boot on the bottom, which is well worth the extra $5 if you want to buy a Takeya. While it didn’t completely eradicate dents, it made a big difference and prevented any paint chipping on the bottom.

Note: The prices above reflect the retailers’ listed price at the time of publication.

Top 10 Best water bottles of 2017

 

We all know that hydrating your body during exercise is important. Not only hydrating, but hydrating while maintaining the purity and quality of the water you drink during a workout is essential. This is easy when you have a good water bottle. Digging out a few dollars from your pockets to make an investment on a good water bottle should be one of the top priorities of any athlete that is involved in serious exercise that may require constant rehydration. A good water bottle should ideally be environmentally friendly and pocket friendly. It should be free of BPA, a chemical that is in plastics and is commonly known as a causative of a variety of human illnesses. The bottles should also have been tested to ensure there are no leaks. In this way, the athlete is assured that the water stays purified and is not contaminated by the micro-organisms from the surroundings. Investing in a good water bottle will help to achieve your athletic goals in the long run and your body will benefit greatly from the hydration. Furthermore, with the sleek and cool designs, you can stay trendy as you keep fit. We focus on the ten highest rated water bottles of 2016 below in a descending order:

  1. Klean Kanteen

This bottle was introduced into the market by Robert Seals to give people a better option than aluminum and plastic bottles that had effects on the quality of water they consumed. During its first months in market, it was widely shared with the target market at outdoor functions and sports events. It is made from high quality stainless steel thus making the bottle hardy. Due to its refillable nature, this bottle is also money saving. Kleen Kanteen does not become smelly if it is used too many times, a popular characteristic of the plastic cans. It is easy to clean using a bottle brush because of its wide mouth. During the summer, when it is sunny, the wide mouth allows you to throw in some ice cubes that you could take with you to your work outs. This bottle also comes in a wide range of colors to choose from and also different sizes to fit your every specific need as an athlete.

  1. LifeStraw Go Water Bottle

This bottle comes with an integrated LifeStraw Filter as an added bonus. This is a premium-grade bottle that filters up to 264 gallons of water. With this bottle, you are sure to eliminate up to 99.9% of bacteria and protozoans from your drinking water thus ensuring that you are taking the purest water. The LifeStraw Go Water Bottle also helps to eliminate heavy metals from the water and neutralizes all odors that affect the quality of drinking water. This bottle is recommended for kids, adults and even athletes. It is BPA free, leak proof, EPA approved and offers 23 ounces of storage for pure, clean water.  The said bottle will give you excellent service for many years as an added advantage. It also comes in an attractive design for those who love to stay stylish.

  1. Citrus Zinger Sports

If you love to feel the twist of fruits such as lemon, grapefruit or lime in your drinking water during workout or just in a bid to stay hydrated, then the Citrus Zinger Sports Water Bottle is specially designed for you. This creative bottle has a juicer inside to ensure that your drinking water stays fruity all day without compromising on the freshness and quality of your water. The juicer can however be removed if you are the kind of person that prefers their water to have a plain taste. It is especially easy to use in the gym if you need a citrus boost because it has a one hand operated straw. This bottle has an added advantage of being leak free.  The bottle has an interesting design feature; they are tinted to give them an edgier look over most of the other bottles in the market. This bottle may be especially of interest to those who engage in intense exercise as the fruity water will help infuse your body with the right vitamins and electrolytes to restore the body’s electrolyte balance.

  1. Embrava Sports Water Bottle

This water bottle is designed and produced by Embrava, a sports and outdoor company that specializes in the production of premium water bottles. It carries up to 18 ounces of water. The Embrava Sports Water Bottle is a BPA free and environmentally friendly bottle made of light materials. This makes it portable and thus easy to carry for outdoor activities such as yoga and mountain climbing. This bottle is shutter-proof and has a well designed lid that is easy to flip thus easing the filling in and emptying and cleaning of the bottle. This bottles straw is also fast flowing thus easing the drinking process. To top it up, the Embrava Bottle has a sleek design and is affordable. The quality you get from this bottle is almost 100% guaranteed.

  1. Great Gear Infuser Water Bottle

This is one great example of a water filter bottle. The 25 ounce bottle capacity is a great one, plus the filter will not disappoint you as the buyer. It is highly suitable for outdoor activities because it is leak-proof. The filter that comes with this bottle is great because it is reusable. It has a dual strainer system to purify your water and a strainer should you want to add some flavor into your drinking water. The good news with the Great Gear Infuser Water Bottle is that it is very affordable and comes with a limited lifetime warranty. It is also BPA free thus making it friendly for the water that is meant to be consumed by humans. The flip top design of the bottle also allows for easier filling, emptying and cleaning of the bottle.

  1. Water/ Vodka Happy Jackson

This is a bottle for those who are not afraid to declare their love for vodka to the world. This bottle is definitely what we view as an infusion of fun and work.  The bottle has a flip top that makes it easy to fill and empty the bottle as the consumer best feels appropriate. It is portable and has a carrier handle that ensures that you can carry it everywhere you go. It has a vibrant design that is surely going to allow you to stand out whatever the activity you are involved in.

  1. FutureSpace Tech Stainless Steel Insulated Sports Water Bottle

This is an insulated sport-grade water bottle that is made of stainless steel. It efficiently maintains the temperature of water for up to 24 hours a day. It is well insulated and durable. This bottle does not contain BPA and therefore it is safe for human use. It is leak proof too and does not leave a metal like aftertaste in the mouth. This bottle is generally ideal for those who are traveling long distances. The FutureSpace Tech Stainless Steel Insulated Sports Water Bottle does not leak in any way. This water bottle is particularly environmentally friendly and reusable.

  1. Camelbak Eddy Glass 0.7-Litre Water bottle

This bottle is an especially exciting product because it serves as a travelling accessory. It is durable and very easy to use. This bottle is leak and spill proof. It comes with a comfortable outer silicon grip that helps to protect the impact areas of the bottle and eases the usage. This bottle is quite different from the others in that it has a built in bite and sip valve that allows an impressive water flow. It is designed for convenience, innovation and high performance. This bottle goes slow on your pockets and you can be guaranteed a lifetime of service when you use it.

  1. Thermos Nissan Intak Hydration Water Bottle with Meter

This stylish water bottle has a blue theme.  It is produced by Thermos, one of the world’s most reputable household accessory makers. It is no wonder that their product is almost at the top of the list of the top 10 best water bottles of the year. It has a high storage capacity of up to 24 ounces. It has a graduate meter that you can make use of when you want to review the water capacity.  This Thermos product is highly hygienic and is made of Tritan copolyester which is odor free. The bottle also has an ergonomic design that enables easy handling of the bottle. Being a high resistance bottle, the Thermos Water Bottle can be used during heavy exercises such as endurance and during out-door activities. This bottle is also spill proof and shatter resistant. It is surely among the best bottles so far in the year.

 

 

The Coldest Water Bottle – Our choice.

Finally, to our best bottle in the year of 2017, the Coldest Water Bottle.  This bottle has amazing capabilities. It can keep a cold drink for up to 24 hours and it can keep a hot drink in that state for up to 13 hours. This insulated stainless steel water bottle helps keep water fresh and free of any odors, be it cold and warm. This ability is only achieved by electropolishing the interior in order to create a smooth surface that gets rid of microscopic elements from the material and leaving a highly sterilized surface. It has a double wall and a vacuum in between the walls to ensure the best insulation. With good insulation, the water bottle retains ice for up to 24 hours, an amount of time in which you will have finished the water in the flask. The Coldest Water Bottle will ensure that you are not exposed to toxins and resins in any way. This is because it does not use any BPA products when manufacturing.  You are therefore assured of constant good health.

The Coldest Water Bottle also has an interesting design. It is relatively easy to use because of its weight of less than 500 grams. Even if you fill up the bottle with water, it is still easy to carry it around with you. The bottle has a sleek design with an attractive logo printed on it. The bottle has a perfect locking system that ensures that your water stays in its place even during vigorous movements. The bottle is also durable and if you buy it, it can be a sign of quality guarantee. This is because of the high quality standards maintained by the company when producing the water bottles.

 

Conclusion

There are many great bottle products out in the world market right now but you have to make good use of your money and get a bottle that guarantees the best use for your coins. Beware that plastic bottles have a substance than can cause you to get sick. Furthermore, plastics are not good for the soil. They take years and years to decompose and this causes major pollution issues. A stainless steel bottle however, is bound to serve you longer and thus it is a preferable to go for one. Stainless steel does not deform and will serve you until almost forever. Choose bottles that are well insulated, with a good and easy to use lid that is comfortable for you, whether you are an athlete or a child or teenager. Make sure that you choose a bottle that serves your taste and preferences as an individual.

Many leading brands mentioned above are of extremely good quality and they are highly recommended. The Coldest Water Bottle however has been designed and produced under highly controlled conditions to ensure highest quality is delivered to customers everywhere. In a bid to make the best out of your hydration, make use of the wonderful bottles and you will never regret it. You will get quality for your money and you will enjoy your activities as you continue to get hydrated, be it in the gym, or during intense work out sessions. Your body processes will be at their optimum only if you can give the body enough quality water and what better way to do it than through the use of one of the top water bottles of 2016.

8 Best Smart Water Bottles of 2021

Photos Courtesy of Retailers

Hydration is the key to success. No, really, we’re serious here. Water is what gives us life. And beyond that, proper hydration levels keep our bodies functioning properly, our skin glowing, and our energy up all day long. But as simple as it sounds, remembering to drink enough water in a day has somehow become a challenging task. Lucky for us, there are tons of products on the market to make this simple chore far more enjoyable, sort of like a fun drinking game sans the alcohol buzz.

Smart water bottles come in all shapes, sizes, materials, and technologies these days. You’ll hear of water bottles with a plethora of features, but sometimes all the bells and whistles don’t quite fit your lifestyle. And sometimes, all you need is a little motivation to drink up. From collapsible options that save on space, to self-cleaning technology you occasionally have to hand wash, and even Bluetooth-connected smart water bottles that track how much you drink (welcome to the future), at the end of the day, a water bottle will have done its job if it makes you want to drink out of it.

While tech-savvy wellness enthusiasts might love a tracking device that syncs to their health app, others may find the idea of connectivity in a water bottle silly. Before you jump to conclusions, hear us out. And remember, not all smart water bottles are battery powered. Whichever style you prefer, remember a smart water bottle is really just a drinking vessel intelligently designed to solve a problem.

We created this guide to help you find the right water bottle that fits seamlessly into your days and your budget, so you can be a happy, healthier and hydrated human. Check out the 8 best smart water bottles of 2021, tested by the team at Men’s Health, and decide if a smart water bottle is actually worth it, to you. While some tech options fall at a higher price point, remember than nothing is more important than staying hydrated.

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

Best Smart Water Bottle Overall

Hidrate Spark 3

The Hidrate Spark was one of the first smart connected water bottles on the market. The brand has advanced their original design to a third generation, eliminating ticks from previous models. This baby tracks your water intake and literally illuminates to remind you to drink up. It syncs via Bluetooth to the Hidrate app, Fitbit, Apple Health, and more. (It’s even worthy enough to be sold at the Apple Store).

The advanced technology calculates and adjusts personal hydration goals based on your body and activity level. It has smart sensors that record how much you drink, instantly syncing it to your phone for that #connectedlife.

One of our favorite (yet not entirely important) features comes from location tracking. Just like “find my iPhone” you can “find my water bottle” and never lose it again. The lid is dishwasher safe, while the body and sensor are hand washable. One single charge lasts up to four months. This water bottle has it all. Soon your body will be trained to sip more often throughout the day making the $60 ticket well worth it.

Most Versatile Smart Water Bottle

Ozmo Smart Cup

So, the Ozmo doesn’t look like your typical water bottle. It appears as a coffee cup with a lid, which isn’t necessarily wrong. The Ozmo Smart Cup, in fact, is made for activity. It can carry any type of liquid, sealed with intelligence through sensing both water and coffee, with the ability to manually input other beverages. Ozmo gets to know your body through a few key metrics and recommends exactly how much water you should be drinking each day, while also limiting your coffee consumption.

The flashing LED lights communicate both achievement and are a reminder to take a sip or two to meet your hydration goals. You can customize your plan through the Oszmo app and sync it with Fitbit, Apple Watch, Garmin, and other fitness trackers to have your wellness tracking live in one place. You’ll get interactive reports to monitor your hydration over the course of a year for the super committed. An added bonus is the charging station, which keeps hot liquids warm at your desk. 

Best Self-Cleaning Smart Water Bottle

LARQ Bottle

The LARQ bottle doesn’t track your hydration through an app, but it is smart in the way it prepares your it for drinking. LARQ utilizes UV-C light technology to clean out bacteria that sticks around in between washes. Through the pandemic, UV-C light sanitization systems have been on the rise because of how efficient they are. This bottle sanitizes the entire inside, which can sometimes be a tricky task, even when hand scrubbing.

All you have to do is push a button for a 60-second light bath. And when it realizes you aren’t using it regularly, it self-cleans every two hours for the purest possible water. The double insulation version is a bit heavy, but it will keep your liquids hot or cold for an entire day. If you’re looking for a lighter option without the insulation, opt for the LARQ Movement. Clean freaks, you’re going to love this.

Best Smart Water Bottle for Travel

Monos Kiyo UVC Bottle

With a simple wave of a finger (insert Harry Potter reference here), the UVC technology in the Monos’ Kiyo UVC water bottle purifies drinking water inside, eradicating up to 99.99% of bacteria. That means you can fill up your water bottle from the faucet, lake, river, or refrigerator and rest assured that what you’re drinking is clean.

If you’re really thirsty, you can swipe once for a quick clean mode (60 seconds) or wait three minutes on deep clean mode by swiping twice. The soft design doesn’t look as high tech as it is, taking inspiration from classic artisan pottery. 

It charges via USBC-C in just 3 hours for 30 days of normal use. It’s a great portable option that fits in a purse, backpack, or carry-on, while remaining easy to carry and impressive on style. You can’t track your hydration levels, so this is a great option for someone that isn’t always connected, but always on the go.

Best Smart Water Bottle for the Outdoors

Thermos Hydration Bottle with Connected Smart Lid

Thermos isn’t new to the hydration game, but the classic reusable water bottle brand has now stepped into the tech space. They recently launched a smart lid and phone app that senses your water intake and tracks your progress via Bluetooth. The sensor tube reads the volume and temperature of your liquid and tracks it over time.

It is intelligently designed to act as your real time hydration coach with push notifications throughout the day. The tube measures your bottle’s current fill level. While some other smart water bottles on this list can be heavier in weight, require time and patience to learn, and feel like a fragile piece of tech, the Thermos Smart Lid is does not. It’s your basic old outdoor-friendly water bottle, now with a tracking feature.

Icewater 3-in-1 Smart Water Bottle

amazon.com

The Icewater 3-in-1 smart water bottle makes the list as our favorite Bluetooth-enabled speaker. It’s not something entirely necessary, and it doesn’t track your hydration levels, but it’s a fun way to always remember your water bottle for a day’s outing, because if you don’t, you’ll be without music, too. And the base in this tiny speaker exceeded some pretty low expectations.

While there’s no true pattern to its glowing method, the illumination is supposed to remind you to drink up. The tech isn’t as advanced as some of the others on this list, but if you’re looking for an affordable, music-enabled option for summer, this is your guy.

Healthiest Smart Water Bottle

Level Up Way Glass Hydrogen Generator

Wellness junkies are probably aware of the potential benefits to the hydrogen water hype. Essentially, hydrogen water is regular water with gas that may have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Some researchers say it slows down the process of aging, has better mineral absorption and improves muscle recovery after a workout. While current research is limited, those aiming to stay on top of the latest health trends (and boast about it) will love the potential benefits of this hydrogen-forming smart water bottle.

The Level Up Way glass bottle lets you turn any water into hydrogen water through something called SPE PEM technology.  At the press of a button, and a little patience (6 minutes to be exact), this smart bottle ionizes your water making it more bioavailable, introducing molecular hydrogen. Hydrogen water can be expensive, so this one-time purchase is worth your hard-earned money, if you can commit to it. 

Best Non-Tech Smart Water Bottle

Giotto Large Motivational

This water bottle has zero tech features, but it’s smart in how it motivates you to drink up throughout the day. You might laugh or think it’s cheesy, but these little reminders actually work and train your brain to look forward to these tiny milestones.

 If you’re staring at a plain cup, you are much less likely to take a sip and refill than you are to hit the goals listed on this jug. If a $20 water jug can up your hydration levels, take that as a major win. 

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Advertisement – Continue Reading Below

Best reusable water bottles to give as gifts in 2021

If you know someone who could use a new reusable bottle (whether they’re stuck on single-use or they simply need one for outdoor adventures), a high-quality water bottle makes a great gift. By now, everyone knows using a disposable plastic water bottle is bad for the environment and can be harmful to your health. Staying hydrated with a reusable water bottle is one of the easiest ways to start phasing plastic out of your everyday life. 

There’s no shortage of water bottle options on the market. Some offer filtration, vacuum insulation, a straw, spout or a flip top; others are completely collapsible or can tote hot or cold beverages. So encourage your friends to recycle their disposable plastic bottles and replace them with one of these reusable, stylish and durable water vessels.

How to pick a reusable water bottle

Water bottles are mainly made from three different materials: plastic, glass and metal (typically aluminum or stainless steel). Any reusable bottle will have its own hydration pros and cons.

Editors’ top picks

Subscribe to CNET Now for the day’s most interesting reviews, news stories and videos.

Plastic is lightweight and durable, but plastic can transfer a taste or odor to your beverage when you drink. Glass bottle options are safer to drink from than plastic and don’t impart a taste, but they’re fragile and not ideal to use as a travel water bottle or for rough outdoor activities like backpacking. Many glass bottles come in a protective silicone sleeve to prevent breakage. Metal water bottles, like those made from stainless steel, are usually insulated around the body of the bottle and are the best at keeping your hot drink hot and your cold drink cold, but they can be heavy and subject to dents and scratches.

After you decide what material you want your reusable drinking water bottle to be made of, consider the lid type. Do you want a straw lid, a flip cap with a spout (like on a travel mug) or a screw top? Maybe you need a lid that can attach to a backpack with a carabiner or a lid that won’t unscrew in your work bag.

Read more: 7 ways drinking more water can make you healthier

Now playing:
Watch this:

How to tell if your food is safe to eat

2:14

Also, consider size and design when picking your perfect water bottle. Most companies make their bottles available in a variety of sizes, usually ranging from 12 to 40 ounces. Smaller sizes often have thinner, sleeker designs with a narrow mouth, while larger sizes usually mean a wide mouth bottle or a jug-like design good for drinking from at all-day events like a day at the beach. Some have added features like being self-cleaning or filtered.

I scoured the web for the most functional and fashionable reusable water bottle options. I began my search with brands I already knew created good products, like S’well, though I ended up finding a couple that aren’t as widely evangelized, but still create cool products to help you stay hydrated.

From basic bottles to portable pouches to all-day canteens, I tested more than 25 bottles, and the best ones made it to this list. All of the bottles on this list have mostly favorable customer reviews on Amazon in the four-star range (no product can please everyone). In the end, it’s up to you to decide which is the best reusable water bottle — and to stay hydrated. 

Camping? Read more: Best air mattress for 2021: SoundAsleep, REI and more compared  

Hydro Flask

The Hydro Flask exploded in popularity a few years ago and has stayed at the top of the water bottle ranks due to its double wall vacuum insulation design, durable stainless steel materials and fun variety of colors. A Hydro Flask insulated stainless steel bottle keeps a cold beverage cool for up to 24 hours and a hot beverage warm up to 12 hours.

This insulated bottle is tough enough to toss into bags and survive the hustle and bustle of your days (stainless steel, remember?), plus the insulated bottles resist condensation, so the outside of your water bottle will stay dry when you drink. The Hydro Flask vacuum-insulated water bottle comes with a standard lid and spout, but you can always mix and match to make the best water bottle for yourself.

Pressa Bottle

Some people love drinking tap water plain. Some think it’s the most boring liquid to have ever graced this planet, despite it being essential to human survival. I am one of the latter, which is why I love the Pressa Bottle, the infuser water bottle with a built-in juicer. It’s a great reusable water bottle for on-the-go folks who want fruit-infused water but don’t want to deal with making a whole pitcher of it at home. 

All you have to do is put your fruit of choice in the juicer and twist the dial on top. This reusable glass bottle has a silicone sleeve to help your grip and comes apart for easy cleaning. You can also safely clean your Pressa Bottle in the dishwasher.

Tad Martin/CNET

Previously, we listed the Platypus Platy Ultralight Collapsible as the best portable water bottle for backpacking, but since then, Platypus has come out with the Platypus DuoLock Soft Bottle 1.0 L — a sturdier, more stylish version of the Ultralight Collapsible water bottle. The DuoLock Soft Bottle has a built-in carabiner, making it perfect for clearing up space in a hiking backpack: Just clip it on outside instead of stuffing it in. You can choose from 1 liter or 2; in my own hiking experience, I’ve found that 1 liter is sufficient unless you’re heading out for a full daylong trek.

Grayl

The Grayl Geopress Purifier filters out 99.99% of bacteria, viruses, protozoa and sediment. It holds 24 ounces of water, it’s incredibly durable, and it’s easy to clean — a really big deal as heavy-duty filtered water bottles are notoriously difficult to clean. I tested the Grayl Geopress Purifier along with five other filtered water bottles and the Geopress struck me as the safest and the best investment for outdoor use.

Amanda Capritto/CNET

Glass is nontoxic, doesn’t seep chemicals and doesn’t degrade over time, making it a great alternative to a plastic water bottle. The body of this Contigo bottle is made entirely of glass, while the protective outer layer is silicone and the cap is stainless steel. The outer silicone sleeve makes this bottle extra grippy (no broken glass!), and it’s top-rack dishwasher-safe.

I’ve owned many a Contigo bottle and this Purity glass one lived up to the brand’s reputation of making long-lasting, stylish, functional bottles. It’s also one of the least expensive bottles on this list; quite honestly, I don’t know how Contigo even profits off of such inexpensive bottles, especially when they seem to be high-quality and durable. But hey, I’m not complaining about a great reusable water bottle for just $15.

Amanda Capritto/CNET

All of Klean Kanteen’s water bottles are environmentally friendly thanks to the company’s patented chip-resistant, durable finish called Klean Coat. But the Klean Kanteen 20-ounce Insulated Reflect vacuum insulated bottle is especially environmentally friendly, made from just three materials: stainless steel, food-grade silicone and bamboo. It has no paint, ink, coatings or plastic.

It’s easy to carry, with a nice loop handle and the bottle is elegant in its simplicity. Despite lacking the insulated coating that most stainless steel bottles have, the Klean Kanteen Insulated Reflect is still double-wall vacuum-insulated and the bottle kept my water cold for as long as I needed it to. Hot drinks and hot liquids aren’t recommended because of the steel bamboo cap.

Amanda Capritto/CNET

The insulated, stainless steel Roamer from S’well keeps a whopping 64 ounces of water cold and delicious even when it’s hot out. I took this bottle on a 9-mile hike and it lasted me until the end. It was a hot day, so there were no actual ice pieces left, but the water was still ice-cold.

Made from food-grade stainless steel, a S’well bottle is perfect for long, hot beach days and for those who just don’t feel like refilling their bottle several times a day. Because it holds 40 or 64 ounces, depending on the model, and is made of stainless steel, this insulated bottle can get pretty heavy when it’s full, so you might not want this one for hiking or walking around. It’s definitely not the easiest way to carry water on a hike, but overall, I didn’t mind toting this 64-ounce water bottle.

Paige Thies/CNET

I tested the Astrea One water bottle for our list of best filtered water bottles for 2021 and while I wouldn’t recommend using this one with natural freshwater, it works wonders on tap water, filtering out lead, benzene, mercury, copper, chlorine and other undesirables. It also has a great design that’s sturdy, durable and easy to clean.

Tad Martin/CNET

The Que bottle might be the most adorable water bottle I’ve ever used. Made only of silicone and stainless steel, this bottle collapses down to half its size when empty — perfect for anyone who’s always trying to save space in a bag. The Que bottle is also dishwasher-safe, BPA-free and 100% plastic-free. Flexible and durable, this collapsible bottle can withstand drops and falls, plus it bounces back to its normal size and shape even after being totally smushed.

CrazyCap

In another category of reusable water bottles that zap away dirt and pathogens, self-cleaning water bottles use UV-C light to decontaminate water. I tested three self-cleaning UV-C water bottles and the CrazyCap Gen 2 produced the best taste and has the best suite of functions: It has a normal purification mode for tap water and a so-called Crazy Mode for freshwater; an autoclean function; and a slender design that makes it great for taking along in the car and slipping into bags.

Amanda Capritto/CNET

Try as we might, it’s not always possible to avoid a quick stop at a gas station for a bottle of water. Maybe you forgot your reusable water bottle, or you did bring it but you’re in the middle of nowhere and need a clean refill. Enter: Pathwater. 

Pathwater makes the first bottled water in a 100% reusable, recyclable aluminum water bottle. You can find the company’s product at gas stations and convenience stores (use the store locator) and it only costs $2 to $3, depending on the location. You can also buy a case (linked below). The water that comes in these bottles is just as good, if not better, than any water you’d get in a plastic bottle, and they are endlessly reusable and recyclable. 

I stocked my fridge with a case of Pathwater and have been using the same set for nearly a year now! Even if you don’t reuse a Pathwater bottle, it takes five times less energy to recycle than a plastic bottle of the same size, according to the Pathwater website.

More for readers seeking health and hydration

Originally published earlier and updated periodically.

The information contained in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as health or medical advice. Always consult a physician or other qualified health provider regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition or health objectives.

Bottle rockets: water could propel tiny satellites of the future into deep space

Since the CubeSat specification was developed in 1999 by Stanford and California Polytechnic, low-cost satellites have become a reality for academic institutions and companies around the world. Their standardized dimensions and off-the-shelf components make for simpler design and production, but there’s a problem: these 10-centimeter cubes, used widely in fields such as meteorology, communications, and aeronautics, are limited by Earth’s orbit. Now, a team of researchers wants to change that — making interplanetary exploration more affordable by crowdfunding the development of a novel thruster that uses water as its propellant.


Their CubeSat Ambipolar Thruster, or CAT, works in a similar way to existing rocket thrusters — by heating up a propellant and expelling it through a nozzle. In this case, however, the CAT will heat its propellant “to millions of degrees instead of thousands of degrees,” says project leader Ben Longmier from the University of Michigan. That heat turns it into plasma, which is then guided with a magnetic nozzle to where it needs to be. “This extremely high temperature,” Longmier says, “allows for the high efficiency of the engine.” That efficiency, combined with its small size and simple components, also makes it very cheap.

Leaving the safety of Earth’s orbit has been an expensive task

That’s important because leaving the safety of Earth’s orbit has traditionally been an expensive task. India’s recent mission to Mars, widely referred to as “low-budget,” cost the country $72 million. NASA’s Mars Observer cost 10 times as much when it launched in 1992. Longmier and his team are seeking just $50,000 to develop their thruster, which can then be attached to a regular CubeSat to send it far beyond Earth’s orbit. “It would usher in a whole new capability for small satellites,” Longmier says.

There are hundreds of potential uses for the technology. A fleet of satellites observing the atmospheres of other planets could be as dense as those tracking Earth’s. Scientists could gather far more data on solar flares, making space weather more predictable. A proliferation of CubeSats would also help identify and tag objects in the asteroid belt for mining or exploration, not to mention the search for life on the watery moons of Saturn and Jupiter or even the creation of an interplanetary internet.

“Space is a risky business.”

However, there are plenty of things that could go wrong between then and now. “Space is a risky business,” Longmier acknowledges. “Things will break. We are pursuing this model of research and development and using space as our new laboratory. In the lab, things break and arc and melt. It’s easy to fix and you’re off running again. In space, if it breaks, it’s likely dead.”

This isn’t so much of a problem with the CAT thruster as with a billion-dollar craft, as another model can be launched at low cost. But running out of funding before the engine becomes operational is a real risk, Longmier says. That’s why the team has taken to Kickstarter to raise funds for its endeavor.

A first attempt at raising $200,000 for the project failed this past August, managing to gather just $68,000 before the deadline. Now, the team has launched a second crowdfunding drive with a lower target of $50,000 that’ll allow — with the help of some private investors — for the creation of a minimum viable thruster. The idea is to get the project moving, then worry about the rest of the funding later.

Of course, if the team surpasses that figure, this preliminary thruster can become more advanced. Raising $80,000 means increased efficiency of the nozzle, while $500,000 will allow the team to increase the throttle range. And if funding reaches $1,750,000, topping the funding gathered for the Arkyd Space Telescope, then the team will send CAT into deep space, allowing backers to vote on its destination.

“We should be developing space technologies with ambitious goals.”

These goals may sound ambitious, but Sara Seager, a professor of Planetary Science and Physics at MIT, applauds the team for its ambition. “As a society we should be developing space technologies with ambitious goals,” says Seager, who isn’t involved in the project. “This is a highly credible team and a sound concept. By giving interplanetary capability to small satellites, they’ll open up interplanetary space to a wide variety of people [including] traditionally non-space-faring nations.”

“Getting a plasma thruster small enough to propel a CubeSat would be very useful,” adds Lucy Rogers, project coordinator at the British Interplanetary Society and the author of It’s Only Rocket Science. Rogers was surprised by the choice of water as propellant, however. “Xenon, the heavy inert gas which is the industry standard for electric propulsion, is 1.7 times more dense than water,” she says. “It takes up less volume for the same amount of oomph. Also, water freezes below zero, so the tank will have to be kept warm.”

“We could refuel at asteroids or depots.”

Longmier plans to start out with xenon, using it to benchmark the thruster’s performance. He says it’ll take around $300,000 in funding to complete the development of a water-propellant system. “Water is everywhere in the solar system,” he says in defense of the tactic. “Long term, we could refuel at asteroids or depots. Short term, water is easy to store and launch. We can even have astronauts launch our little engines from the ISS without any safety concerns.”

For their support, backers of the Kickstarter drive can secure anything from a silk bow-tie to having their name laser-etched onto one of the spacecraft. Pledge $10,000 and the team will fly you from anywhere in the US to press the button that triggers the first firing of the thruster in space. “With this technology, we can explore deep space and other planets faster and cheaper than ever before,” Longmier says. “First, we would like to make space exploration affordable and sustainable. And second, we’d like to open it up to the community and have people be a part of the process.”

90,000 Experts evaluate the taste of a French wine that has been in space for a year – Society

PARIS, 25 March. / TASS /. French oenologists tasted the first bottle of wine from a batch that had been stored for over a year on board the International Space Station (ISS). According to the news portal 20 minutes on Thursday, the specialists will have to conduct a more detailed analysis of the roster, however, already at the first stage, interesting differences were found.

“Being in space with a bottle of wine, which was presented for tasting, did not lead to negative changes in terms of sensory perception,” said Philippe Darier, head of the research department of oenology at the Institute of Viticulture and Wine (ISVV).“And we were especially surprised by its complex and subtle shades.”

Experts checked the 20-year-old Grand Cru (high quality wine) Chateau Petrus, a bottle of which usually costs about € 5,000.12 bottles of this wine, the name of which was still kept secret, spent a total of 438 days and 19 hours in orbit … After returning to Earth, it was kept for some time within the walls of the ISVV, and then on March 1, a tasting was held, in which 12 oenologists participated. 11 of them noticed the difference between the wine that spent a year in orbit and the one that was stored on Earth all this time.

“In my opinion, tannins (substances that give astringency) have become somewhat softer, the bouquet of aromas has become more fruity. Based on the experience of tasting the usual Chateau Petrus in 2000, I would even say that this wine, which has been in space, feels as if two or three years older, “stated oenologist Jane Anson. At the same time, her colleague Frank Dubordier said that he did not feel any significant differences. Nevertheless, according to him, this experiment can already be considered a success, since “the wine has not become worse during its stay in space.”

Winemaker Space Program

Co-founder of Space Biology Unlimited, based in Bordeaux, France, Nicolas Gaume explained that the goal of his project is to find solutions for the agriculture of the future in the face of climate change.

“While American business and major American, Chinese and global agencies are discussing flights to the moon, to Mars, we care about the Earth, – he explained. – The Earth is changing, and we believe that there are answers in space that allow us to think about what will be the agriculture and viticulture of tomorrow. “

Gom promised that his company will continue research, including chemical and genetic analyzes of changes in various crops, but all of them will be one way or another centered around winemaking. According to him, even now researchers can say that the vines, which were on the ISS along with the bottles of wine, “grew much faster than on Earth”, they have more leaves and more ovaries. “So far we cannot draw any conclusions, but these results charge us with enthusiasm to continue working,” said the head of the company.

He also said that he does not intend to stop there and plans to conduct a new experiment in orbit next year. This time, the goal will be to study the fermentation of wine in zero gravity. In total, according to the plans announced in 2019, six experiments are planned as part of the Vitis Vinum In Spatium Experimentia mission, one of which has already taken place, and the rest will take place until 2022.

Five of the most exciting space missions of the future

  • David Robson
  • BBC Future

Photo author, Thinkstock

Last year, mankind successfully landed a lander on a comet.What new achievements in space science are ahead of us? Correspondent

BBC Future talks about five of the most exciting expeditions possible in the foreseeable future.

The landing of the European spacecraft Philae on the surface of a comet flying at a speed of 135,000 km / h marked the beginning of a new chapter in space exploration. It will take many years before we can realize the scale of the discoveries that will be made during this expedition.Meanwhile, scientists are asking the inevitable question – what’s next?

BBC Future brings you five of the most incredible missions the world space agencies hope to accomplish – including a plan to capture an asteroid, a dive into an ice-bound ocean on Jupiter’s moon, and perhaps even a flight to a distant star.

Drifting settlements in the Venusian atmosphere

Photo author, NASA

Photo caption,

Venus: Earth’s sinister sister

Venus is often referred to as Earth’s sinister twin sister.The planet is similar in size to ours, but has a toxic atmosphere spilled by acid rain. Nevertheless, the scientific team of the American space agency NASA, led by Jeffrey Landis, is investigating the possibility of sending astronauts into orbit of Venus to remotely control rovers on its surface. Landis’s plans are not limited to this – in his opinion, people could live inside balloons drifting in the upper layers of the Venusian atmosphere, above the poisonous clouds.At an altitude of about 50 km from the surface of Venus, atmospheric pressure and temperature are very similar to those observed in the surface layers of the atmosphere on Earth. A giant ball filled with breathable air will float freely at this altitude without decreasing due to the pressure difference in the atmosphere of Venus.

Sea voyage on Titan

Photo author, NASA

Photo caption,

There are also clouds on Titan. But from methane

The weather on Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, is very similar to Earth’s, except that the clouds are composed of methane, which, falling to the surface in the form of rain, forms lakes and seas.NASA and the European Planetary Science Congress are independently considering the possibility of landing a floating research vehicle on the surface of one of these seas. For this it is necessary to solve several complex technical problems. First, Titan is covered with a thick layer of clouds, which makes it impossible to use solar-powered motors. Accordingly, nuclear fuel will have to be used. Second, Titan will need an unconventional engine to navigate the viscous sea surface.Perhaps the choice will be made in favor of a worm screw (like a screw in a meat grinder), “drilling” a liquid medium. True, NASA has suspended work on its program, and the European project is still at an early stage.

Under-ice exploration in Europe

Photo author, NASA

Photo caption,

What is Europe under the ice?

More promising discoveries may lurk under the ice crust of Jupiter’s moon Europa. Due to the great distance from the Sun, Europe receives very little heat, but it is possible that under the ice there is water in a liquid state, heated by tectonic activity in the bowels of the planet.To get to it, you need a “cryobot” – a device capable of using heat to pave its way through ice several kilometers thick. NASA is already working on such a device, which is called the “Valkyrie”. The device heats water using an onboard nuclear power source and directs a jet onto the ice, melting it. Then “Valkyrie” collects the melt water and repeats the procedure, gradually moving forward. During tests in Alaska, a small prototype overcame an eight-kilometer ice thickness within a year.As a result, the program received a significant influx of funding to further develop the technology. If the expedition succeeds, scientists hope for the first time to discover life outside the Earth – in their opinion, the warm ocean of Europa could be inhabited.

Catch an asteroid

Photo author, NASA

Photo caption,

Catch an asteroid? Why not?

If landing on a comet was extremely difficult, NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission holds the record for ambition.The idea is to capture an asteroid and tow it into lunar orbit, where astronauts will land on it to take soil samples. As with the Philae spacecraft, soil analysis from an asteroid will provide new insights into the origin of the solar system. In addition, within the framework of the program, it is planned to develop a technology for protection against the meteorite threat to the Earth. NASA has a list of six asteroids potentially suitable for mission targets. How exactly the capture of a celestial body will take place has not yet been decided; Among the options being considered is the use of a giant inflatable container that will house the asteroid.If all goes according to plan, NASA predicts, the program will be implemented over the next 15 years.

Interstellar flight

Photo author, Thinkstock

Photo caption,

Interstellar travel may seem like fairy tales for children at the moment. But only so far

If expeditions within the solar system don’t impress you too much, then how about a flight to Alpha Centauri? If the 100 Year Starship, a joint project of NASA and the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), gets the green light, perhaps humanity will go to the closest star outside the solar system during the lifetime of the current newborns.At the very least, the project leaders are counting on the technology needed for interstellar travel within the next 100 years – such as an antimatter engine. It will also be necessary to think about measures to prevent the consequences of prolonged stay in space for the human body. Given the current state of science, the chances of the mission’s success seem negligible. On the other hand, 150 years ago, Jules Verne’s novel about the flight to the moon, too, must have seemed to his contemporaries only a fantasy – in those days there were no aircraft heavier than air.So the plot of Christopher Nolan’s fresh science fiction film “Interstellar” may not be so far from reality.

Isn’t it time to give up astronauts on the ISS? Anyway, from people in space?

  • Richard Hollingham
  • BBC Future

Photo Credit, NASA / Getty Images

In November, the International Space Station has a jubilee – for 20 years it has been constantly inhabited by people. But isn’t it time to hang up spacesuits on a hook and entrust space exploration to robots?

On November 20, 1998 at 6:50 am GMT, I was squatting behind a boulder in the Kazakh steppe, trying to hide from the piercing wind and holding my mobile phone to my ear.

Snow-covered ground merged on the horizon with a gray sky. Behind me, a loudspeaker grumbled something incomprehensible in Russian, but most of the Russians it was meant for were in a wooden building nearby, pouring vodka and preparing to celebrate the launch.

Far ahead, almost indistinguishable from the monochrome landscape, a white Proton rocket towered on the launch pad. Suddenly, with a deafening rumble and flash, she began to lift off the ground.

As the rocket climbed and disappeared into the clouds, I described what was happening live to BBC radio listeners.

After all, it was a historic moment – the launch into orbit of the first module of the future ISS, the Zarya functional cargo block. However, despite my best efforts, the event did not make headlines on the BBC.

Even the fact that the broadcasting corporation sent not an experienced reporter, but a novice employee to cover the launch, shows how both editors and listeners treated this story at that time.

The ISS was already a “long-term construction” and a project on which too much was spent.The then head of research at the British Space Agency called the station “a white elephant in orbit” and the United Kingdom declined to participate in its funding. Many doubted at all that the assembly of the ISS would ever be completed.

The skeptics were wrong. The station, the size of an American football field, with living space comparable to a six-bedroom home, is unambiguously a remarkable piece of engineering.

Since the first long-term expedition in November 2000, astronauts and astronauts have been constantly living and working there, taking turns.To date, 243 people from 19 countries have flown to the orbital station. About 3 thousand scientific experiments have been carried out on the ISS.

Photo author, Yuri Kochetkov / AFP / Getty Images

Photo caption,

Launch of the rocket that delivered the Zarya module, the first part of the ISS, into orbit in 1998

And nevertheless, doubts about the value of the ISS for humanity remain – not to mention how much it cost humanity. Its assembly in orbit cost taxpayers in the United States, Russia, Europe, Canada and Japan about $ 150 billion.

When the world was seized by a pandemic of a dangerous disease, when the sword of Damocles of the consequences of climate change hangs over the planet, the question arises again of why send people into space and spend so much money on it.

“I would say quite confidently that the ISS is not worth a 12-figure sum,” says British cosmologist and astrophysicist Martin John Rhys. “Not one of those hundreds of people who orbited inside the ISS has done anything so valuable for science. , which could justify at least a small part of the money spent by society on shuttles and an orbital station. “

According to Lord Rhys, instead, public money should have been spent on unmanned, robotic science missions – they have already changed our understanding of the universe.

Currently, space probes are sending photographs and data from Mars and Jupiter to Earth, and two Voyagers have left the solar system and entered interstellar space for the first time in human history.

In 2014, mankind even managed to land a probe on a comet 4 km wide, flying at a speed of 55 thousand kilometers.km per hour 56 billion km from the Earth.

“If you ask yourself what we learned from the ISS, it turns out that much more news came from Hubble and the Martian missions,” continues Fig. – The orbital station appears on the news when [on board] Chris Hadfield sings or when a toilet breaks down there. I think in the future it will be harder and harder to justify using public money to send people into space. ”

Since I witnessed that launch in 1998, a lot has changed.The ISS is still almost entirely funded from the pockets of taxpayers, but the future of manned space travel is currently being created by private companies – not less than the state space agencies. The main drive comes from the ambitions of people like Elon Musk (CEO of SpaceX) and Jeff Bezos (founder and CEO of Amazon, the richest man in the world).

Bezos prefers to think of giant colonies spinning in space. However, all these dreams that it will be possible to abandon the Earth with all its problems and fly away from them are not shared by everyone in the community of space explorers.

Photo author, NASA / Getty Images

Photo caption,

To date, the ISS has cost humanity (and taxpayers) about $ 150 billion

“The idea of ​​manned space flight is distorted,” says Linda Billings, an analyst at the US National Institute of Aerospace research.

“When I say corrupted, I mean corrupted,” she explains. “It’s ineffective. It’s too expensive. And the main thing for me is why all this?”

Billings believes that the motivation for human spaceflight is not scientifically supported.

“The rationale looks very shaky to me – it’s a political rationale that rests on a belief in the value of conquest and exploration,” she says.

Of course, you might argue that without conquest and exploration, the present civilization would not exist. And few people question the courage of the pioneers of space flights, who were sent in experimental rockets into orbit, and even to the moon.

Billings, however, stresses that we can well explore space without leaving Earth.

“NASA is doing a brilliant job of researching climate change, but politicians and the corporate world are responding to this: thank you very much, but we are not interested,” she continues. water?”

And here we come to another delicate issue: inequality lies at the heart of human space flight programs. Who has flown and is flying there?

Among the first generation of cosmonauts and astronauts, all were white men, with the exception of Valentina Tereshkova.Most were military test pilots. And to this day, most astronauts are pilots, many are former military.

In July 1969, shortly after the launch of Apollo 11 to the Moon, southern US black rights activists staged a protest at Cape Canaveral. What was the protest against? Against the launch of people into space at a time when many in the country live in poverty.

Similar clashes of points of view may arise in the future, says American civil law lawyer (and space exploration enthusiast) Robert Patillo.

“By 2050, we will have private orbital stations where people can take vacations, and if your income allows you, it will probably be possible to fly to Mars by the end of this century to live there,” he says …

Photo author, Paul Hennessy / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Photo caption,

The future of space research is now increasingly in the hands of private companies like SpaceX Elon Musk

a fair share of taxes to ensure that on Earth we have a normal health care and education system, access to clean water and other things fundamental for the normal functioning of society? ” he says.

Even if Musk gets to Mars, it is unlikely that Martian society will be the utopia that some dream about. The surface of this planet is a dusty red desert. There is no air to breathe. There are no products. And if water exists, it is in the form of ice.

The first settlers will be located at a distance of 225 million km from the Earth, and any signal for help will go on for about 24 minutes, and a response from the home planet will have to wait another 24 minutes.

“Mankind is not ready to leave the Earth,” says Billings.“We still have a lot of intellectual, social and moral changes to go through before we can even begin to think about it.”

So we’re in too much of a rush to colonize space? a species that evolved for life on Earth

“We shouldn’t see ourselves as the culmination of evolution,” he stresses. – In just a couple of centuries, creatures will appear on Earth that are very different from humans – either genetically modified people, or creatures whose part of the body has been replaced with electronic stuffing.And among these, in a sense, our descendants, there will certainly be those who will fly into deep space. “

Over the 20 years of its existence, the ISS has taught us that to live and work in the middle of an airless space, sealed as in a tin can, there is only processed food, drinking water obtained from our own urine and sweat is difficult and expensive.

Perhaps one of the main achievements of this orbital station can be attributed to the fact that it helped us to better appreciate our Earth.Talk to any of the astronauts: the view of our planet through the ISS window is what inspired them the most. And us too.

To read the original of this article in English, visit BBC Future.

what Bradbury invented him and what he really became – Future on vc.ru

Space ships, mobile phones and the Internet first appeared in science fiction books and movies, but they came into reality in a completely different form.So it happened with the concept of a smart home. We will tell you how it originated and what happened to it.

{“id”: 215379, “url”: “https: \ / \ / vc.ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on-stal-na- samom-dele “,” title “:” \ u0423 \ u043c \ u043d \ u044b \ u0439 \ u0434 \ u043e \ u043c: \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u0435 \ u0433 \ u043e \ u44043 u0434 \ u0443 \ u043c \ u0430 \ u043b \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0434 \ u0431 \ u0435 \ u0440 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u044 u043d \ u0430 \ u0441 \ u0430 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043c \ u0434 \ u0435 \ u043b \ u0435 “,” services “: {” facebook “: {” url “:” https: \ / \ / www.facebook.com \ / sharer \ /sharer.php? u = https: \ / \ / vc.ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on-stal- na-samom-dele “,” short_name “:” FB “,” title “:” Facebook “,” width “: 600,” height “: 450},” vkontakte “: {” url “:” https: \ / \ /vk.com \ /share.php? url = https: \ / \ / vc.ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on-stal-na -samom-dele & title = \ u0423 \ u043c \ u043d \ u044b \ u0439 \ u0434 \ u043e \ u043c: \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u0435 \ u0433 \ u043e \ u043f \ u044 \ u043e \ u04043f \ u044 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0434 \ u0431 \ u0435 \ u0440 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043e \ u0431d \ u230 \ u043 \ u043e \ u043d \ u230 \ u043b \ u0430 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043c \ u0434 \ u0435 \ u043b \ u0435 “,” short_name “:” VK “,” title “:” \ u0412 \ u041a \ u043e \ u043d \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043a \ u044 , “width”: 600, “height”: 450}, “twitter”: {“url”: “https: \ / \ / twitter.com \ / intent \ / tweet? url = https: \ / \ / vc.ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on-stal-na-samom- dele & text = \ u0423 \ u043c \ u043d \ u044b \ u0439 \ u0434 \ u043e \ u043c: \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u0435 \ u0433 \ u043e \ u043f \ u030440 \ u043e \ u043f \ u030440 \ u044 u043b \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0434 \ u0431 \ u0435 \ u0440 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043d \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u043d \ u0441 \ u30442 \ u043d \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u04d u043c \ u043e \ u043c \ u0434 \ u0435 \ u043b \ u0435 “,” short_name “:” TW “,” title “:” Twitter “,” width “: 600,” height “: 450},” telegram “: {” url “:” tg: \ / \ / msg_url? url = https: \ / \ / vc.ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on-stal-na-samom-dele & text = \ u0423 \ u043c \ u043d \ u044b \ u0439 \ u0434 \ u043e \ u043c : \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u0435 \ u0433 \ u043e \ u043f \ u0440 \ u0438 \ u0434 \ u0443 \ u043c \ u0430 \ u043b \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0440 \ u044d u0438 \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043d \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u043d \ u0430 \ u0441 \ u0430 \ u043c \ u043e \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043d \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u043d \ u0430 \ u0441 \ u0430 \ u043c \ u043e “\ u043c” : “TG”, “title”: “Telegram”, “width”: 600, “height”: 450}, “odnoklassniki”: {“url”: “http: \ / \ / connect.ok.ru \ / dk? st.cmd = WidgetSharePreview & service = odnoklassniki & st.shareUrl = https: \ / \ / vc.ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on -stal-na-samom-dele “,” short_name “:” OK “,” title “:” \ u041e \ u0434 \ u043d \ u043e \ u043a \ u043b \ u0430 \ u0441 \ u0441 \ u043d \ u0438 \ u043a \ u0438 ” , “width”: 600, “height”: 450}, “email”: {“url”: “mailto:? subject = \ u0423 \ u043c \ u043d \ u044b \ u0439 \ u0434 \ u043e \ u043c: \ u043a \ u0430 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u0435 \ u0433 \ u043e \ u043f \ u0440 \ u0438 \ u0434 \ u0443 \ u043c \ u0430 \ u043b \ u0411 \ u0440 \ u044d \ u0434 \ u0438 \ u04d \ u0434 \ u040431 \ u04d \ u0434 \ u0438 \ u04 \ u0438 \ u0438 \ u04 \ u043a \ u0438 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043d \ u0441 \ u0442 \ u0430 \ u043b \ u043d \ u0430 \ u0441 \ u0430 \ u043c \ u043e \ u043c \ u0434 \ u0435 / u035 & body =ru \ / future \ / 215379-umnyy-dom-kakim-ego-pridumal-bredberi-i-kakim-on-stal-na-samom-dele “,” short_name “:” Email “,” title “:” \ u041e \ u0442 \ u043f \ u0440 \ u0430 \ u0432 \ u0438 \ u0442 \ u044c \ u043d \ u0430 \ u043f \ u043e \ u0447 \ u0442 \ u0443 “,” width “: 600,” height “: 450”}}, “isFavorited” false}

6621

views

Home Automation System, 1955

Western fiction

In 1950, the American Ray Bradbury first described the modern concept of a smart home: Collier magazine published the story “It Will Be Tender Rain” from the series “The Martian Chronicles”.It paints a rather grim picture. The main character is a smart house that survived after a nuclear war. Systems continue to work in empty rooms – cooking, cleaning, putting on music, reading poetry.

In the living room, the talking clock sang insistently: tick-tock, seven o’clock, seven in the morning, it’s time to get up! – as if afraid that no one would listen to them.The house, enveloped in morning silence, was empty. The clock kept ticking and repeating, repeating itself into emptiness: nine minutes past seven, everything is ready for breakfast, nine minutes past seven! In the kitchen, the stove sighed hoarsely and lifted from its hot belly eight perfectly toasted toasts, four fried eggs, sixteen slices of bacon, two cups of coffee and two glasses of cold milk

“It Will Be Sweet Rain”, Ray Bradbury

Another attribute of the houses of the future in Bradbury’s works is giant TV-walls: they are found in Velda and the same Martian Chronicles.And in “Fahrenheit 451” there is a description of the technology:

– Very funny indeed. And then it will be even funnier when we allow ourselves the fourth TV wall. Do you think it will take us a long time to save money in order to break the fourth wall and replace it with a fourth television wall? It only costs two thousand dollars.

– This is a third of my annual salary.

“But only two thousand,” Mildred objected. – Sometimes it would not hurt to think about me. If we had a fourth TV wall, then this room would seem to be not ours at all. It would turn into rooms of various exotic people. We can easily do without something else …

Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury

Bradbury smart home consists of a variety of mechanisms and machines that serve basic human needs.Automation acts as if by itself – the text does not describe consoles, control devices and command interfaces. Everything in the spirit of Bradbury is beautiful, to some extent fabulous, but hardly practical.

Slices of toasted bread jumped out of the silver toaster, and a spider metal hand immediately grabbed them and dipped them into the melted butter.Mildred watched the toast roll onto the plate.

Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury

This is a special feature not only of Bradbury, but of the fantasy of the mid-20th century in general.The writers were not interested in the principles of work of smart houses in their works – it was enough that the system speaks and takes care of the residents. We will never know exactly how she monitors food purchases, prepares and performs other tasks. For example, Clifford Simack in 1967’s The Werewolf Principle describes a smart home like this:

– And I won’t cook for long! – shouted the Kitchen.- What does the owner want?

– Yes, I probably wouldn’t mind eating, – Blake replied. “How about scrambled eggs and ham and a couple of slices of toasted bread?

“It’s equally easy for me to do anything,” said Kitchen. – Cheese croutons? Lobster?

The Werewolf Principle, Clifford Simak

The smart home in the books looked like a living organism that works by itself.Some of their stories and novels, of course, have become reality: huge TVs hang on the walls, and smart devices may ask the owner’s preferences. But now we know exactly how they work and why.

In Soviet fiction

Massively TV sets, vacuum cleaners and refrigerators appeared in the USSR in the 1950s – 1960s.There was no need to talk about high-tech housing then – the building codes of those years did not imply the automation of everyday life. But that didn’t stop us from speculating about what the future might be.

The Strugatsky brothers in the “Noon” cycle describe the Delivery Line – a hatch with a keyboard: you dial the code of the required order and in a moment things appear inside. The writers did not explain on what principle the system works: perhaps it is teleportation or something like pneumatic mail.In any case, this is more impressive than modern day delivery of goods by drones. This is how the Line is described in the story “The Return”:

He went to the Delivery Line window, typed in the code at random and waited with curiosity to see what would happen. A green lamp flashed above the window: the order was completed. The navigator slid the cover with some apprehension.At the bottom of a spacious cube box was a cardboard plate. The navigator took it and put it on the table. On the plate were two strong, lightly salted cucumbers.

“Return”, Arkady and Boris Strugatsky

And in “Things of the Age of Predators” the Strugatskys even show a semblance of a smart home.Perhaps the reason is that the novel is set in a capitalist country:

– … Everything is here … Come here. This is the bedroom. Here is the acoustic protection remote control. Do you know how to use?

– I’ll figure it out.

– Good. Three-layer protection, you can arrange a grave or a brothel here, whatever you like … Here is the air conditioning control.Made, by the way, inconvenient: you can control only from the bedroom …

“Predatory things of the century”, Arkady and Boris Strugatsky

In modern cinema

The closer to the future that science fiction writers have been waiting for, the more often smart homes are found in their works.In the 1950s – 1960s, several American writers spoke about them, and by the 2000s, a rare science fiction film did without a smart home with voice and video interfaces: “Sixth Day”, “Minority Report”, Ex machina. And the 1999 film “Smart Home” was completely based on Bradbury’s “Velda”.

This is how smart home was introduced in the 1990s

In the Simpsons special “Treehouse of Horror XII,” the smart home looks at the world with the eye of HAL 3000 from A Space Odyssey, and speaks in the voice of Pierce Brosnan.The system tries to kill Homer Simpson in order to take possession of Marge.

And the writer of the White Christmas series “Black Mirror” Charlie Brooker came up with perhaps the most sophisticated way of programming a smart home. A rich woman takes a copy of her consciousness so that she can control the house: turn on the heating of the floors, wake up in the morning, make toast – after all, no one knows you better than yourself.

The scriptwriters loved the concept of a smart home. For example, Tony Stark – “genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist” appeared in such scenery. The superhero not only lived in a high-tech house, but also constantly communicated with a voice assistant. Smart devices can also be seen in the James Bond films – for security, the world’s best secret agent often relies on high technology.

In reality

In reality, a smart home is a privilege available not only to superheroes and special agents from films. Technologies to make your home smart are becoming more affordable every year. Modern smart home systems consist of three components.

– A hub that connects all components with each other and with the outside world. As a rule, this is a smartphone with an application.

– Sensors that receive information about the situation. For example, sensors for movement, temperature and water leakage.

– Actuators that execute commands.Most of them are: sockets, alarms and appliances – from washing machines and air conditioners to robotic vacuum cleaners.

Smart home systems can do a lot, but they haven’t reached the level that Ray Bradbury invented yet: the stove does not prepare dinner by itself, and smart speakers still have to learn how to maintain a dialogue at the human level. But they can now recognize speech, chat about the weather, turn on whatever music you ask, play with you in the cities or order a taxi – just say where you want to go.We tell the TV which video to open, set up the microclimate and lighting in the apartment. Smart devices allow owners to remotely turn off appliances, control home alarms and be confident that their home and loved ones are safe. The modern smart home turns out differently from the Bradbury books, and in some ways it is perhaps much better. And certainly more comfortable and understandable.

90,000 Little Prince: when the first child can be born in space :: RBC Trends

Life on other planets has been prophesied to us for a long time.But on the way to extraterrestrial civilization, the task is to study the conditions of human reproduction in space. As a consequence, serious medical and ethical problems arise.

Looking back at the history of space travel in the future, people will definitely remember three people: Yuri Gagarin, Neil Armstrong, and the first child to be born in space.

We are already preparing for the appearance of the latter: in 2018, NASA sent frozen human sperm to the ISS, researchers are trying to find out whether it will survive in microgravity, and SpaceBorn United is planning missions for conception and childbirth in space (which, according to their estimates , should take place already in 2028).In addition, in 2016, entrepreneur Igor Ashurbeyli established the whole space state of Asgardia, whose development agenda in 2019 included an item on creating conditions for the birth of a child in space over the next 22 years.

However, many experts look at these ambitious plans, albeit with interest, but not without fear. Scientists have been studying the issue of reproduction in space for a long time, but it is still unknown whether a person is capable of procreation in space conditions. Experiments on rats, flies, fish and birds have shown that there will definitely be problems.

So, in 1990, eight quails hatched aboard the Mir orbital station, but they did not have time to live. In 1999, they managed to go further and return three chicks to Earth. Initially, the experiment pursued quite “mundane” goals, namely, obtaining another possible source of power for the astronauts, but it showed another thing – in principle, nucleation in orbit is possible.

Fish were also sent into space – guppies and Japanese orizia, which also hatched fry.They, however, have two huge advantages over humans. First, they live in water, which is why they are initially partially ready for weightlessness. Secondly, fish do not have implantation and early embryonic development, so the experiment is not the most revealing for mammals. In addition, it turned out that the ovaries of fish that have been in space conditions were impaired, probably due to radiation. For the male sex, radiation is no less harmful: it is known that radiation can damage the structure of the sperm.In addition, the male reproductive system in space conditions is also subject to changes associated with weightlessness.

Futurology

A century-long road: which path will the development of mankind take

Astronauts tried to grow newts from caviar and immediately faced developmental pathologies: instead of multiple division (2-4-8) under normal conditions, the eggs began to divide chaotically in space, which made scientists draw a disappointing conclusion: women who conceived outside of the Earth are likely to face early termination of pregnancy.

Earlier, Vladimir Sychev, deputy director for research at the Institute of Biomedical Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said that the only organism that reproduced well in space was flies, three generations of which were grown on the Foton biosatellite. Some of them returned to Earth, and some went back to space. As a result, it turned out that the returned flies multiplied in zero gravity conditions much more productively than those that remained on Earth.

The main problem of all these experiments is their low applicability to humans.A full-cycle experiment has never been carried out on more or less developed species. In addition, a number of studies claim that extraterrestrial children will be viable only in extraterrestrial conditions: their heart, skeleton, muscles and immunity will be weak and designed to survive in the absence of gravity.

In addition to technical and biological problems, there are ethical ones: experiments that in one way or another affect children and pregnant women will always be controversial. Researchers are facing a very difficult task: to minimize the risks and ensure the safety of both the unborn child and his mother in conditions completely different from earthly conditions, poorly studied and to some extent unpredictable.In addition, you need to make sure that the baby will be born in an environment that he or she wants to live in at all. This raises another question: where will such a child grow up? As mentioned above, it is likely that it will be able to live only in space, that is, it may not be adapted at all for functioning on other planets. In addition, psychologically, life in space conditions cannot be called easy: such an existence can give rise to a strong feeling of loneliness and problems with adaptation.

Despite all these problems, entrepreneurs and researchers do not give up hope that space tourism and planetary colonization are not far off.In their opinion, in order to survive in the future, it is critically important for people to learn how to reproduce in space. Otherwise, settlements on Mars and the Moon will remain on the pages of science fiction writers.

90,000 Klushantsev: the first in the cinema space. 10 facts about the Soviet director admired by George Lucas and Stanley Kubrick with Pavel Klushantsev.To the question “who is this?” Lucas replied that he was the master of space films, the “godfather” of the Star Wars series. They tried to find the director, forgotten by that time, but could not. The meeting did not take place. And this is just one of many seemingly incredible stories about the Leningrad creator of space films of the 50s-60s.

Pavel Klushantsev was born in St. Petersburg in 1910. In 1930 he graduated from the Leningrad Photo-Cinema School (now the St. Petersburg State Institute of Cinema and Television) with a degree in operator.During the siege of Leningrad, he worked as a documentary chronicler. From the second half of the 40s, he moved on to staging films that combine elements of science fiction and popular science cinema, which is considered his know-how. For cinema, Klushantsev actively developed special stunt effects that influenced the development of world spectacular cinema. In 1957 – four years before the flight of Yuri Gagarin! – demonstrated in detail the trip on a spaceship in the film “The Road to the Stars”. In 1961 his fiction film “Planet of Storms” about an expedition to the planet Venus was released.He also created two lyrical and technical fantasies on the theme of further space exploration – the tapes “Moon” (1965) and “Mars” (1968). In the 70s he moved away from cinema and turned to literature, published several books for children. He died in St. Petersburg in 1999.

On the occasion of Cosmonautics Day, Fontanka asked those who knew Klushantsev personally – the director of his paintings Alexander Kharkevich and the Danish director Sonia Westerholt, who made a documentary about Pavel Vladimirovich. We remembered the time when ours were the first not only in space, but also in its screen equivalent.

1. The eruption of the Venusian volcano Klushantsev “blinded” from dough at the Lennauchfilm studio

Photo: PLANET STORM (1961) Share

This is one of the most spectacular scenes from Klushantsev’s film “The Planet of Storms” (1961). Alexander Kharkevich was lucky: he was present at the shooting.

– I came to work at Lennauchfilm in 1960, just in the midst of filming Planet of Storms, – Kharkevich recalls. – Everything that was done at the studio at that time was about the picture of Pavel Vladimirovich.It was the number one movie. You can also judge by the success that he has earned. On Nevsky Prospekt in the Znaniye cinema, he walked for over a year. Moreover, both daytime and evening sessions were “bitko m “. Everyone went to watch “Planet of Storms.”

There was such an episode – a volcanic eruption on Venus, fiery lava flowed. An ordinary director would say that you need to equip an expedition somewhere to Kamchatka and wait for the lava to flow. And Pavel Vladimirovich filmed all this in the fourth pavilion of Lennauch.He consulted with some bakers – fortunately, next to the studio there is a mill plant – from there they put in some third-rate flour, and with the help of specialists, they kneaded … You know, when they used to put bread on baking, the dough protruded from the pan. And then they enhanced this effect and added phosphorescent paints. Plus backlight. And the volcano is ready in the fourth pavilion. Then we all went there to look, it was extremely interesting.

2. Foreign journalists believed that Klushantsev filmed real rockets at a real cosmodrome.And they were offended when he said l that this was not so

According to Kharkevich, a journalist from France tried to find out the “secret of the cosmodrome” from Klushantsev and was offended when he heard that there was no secret:

– Unfortunately, I have forgotten the title of this French scientific and technical journal. Such a thick and very serious magazine. And so, his publisher appeared in Leningrad, in his plans was a meeting with Pavel Vladimirovich. And this was the period when the appearance of a foreigner is already an event.The directors did not have separate offices at that time, but on this occasion the deputy director of the studio vacated his office, they removed the sign with his name from the door, and there Pavel Vladimirovich received the Frenchman, as if in “his” office.

The Frenchman asks: “Tell me, please, at which cosmodrome did you shoot all the episodes with the equipment?” Pavel Vladimirovich says: “No, we filmed it with Ivan Ivanovich Egorov in the third pavilion.” Egorov was his favorite artist. To which the journalist said: “You know, I am a technically savvy person, I understand that your answer is probably due to secrecy.”Pavel Vladimirovich wound up and said: “Let’s go to my house, I’ll show you the sketches,” they were lying in rolls on the mezzanine. The journalist left unhappy.

3. Klushantsev’s films were highly appreciated by cosmonauts and Sergei Korolev himself

“Space workers”, Kharkevich recalls, was surprised by the accuracy with which Klushantsev showed what he could not see himself – either for reasons of secrecy, or because that at the time of filming this had not even been invented yet.

I must say, outwardly Klushantsev did not make an impression – such a teacher of mathematics or physics at school, he admits. – Not like “ah, here, I’m a director!”. And he spoke softly. He was focused, and I perceived it as dim, and at first he disappointed me. Then we got to know each other better, and when we went to the shooting on the bus, I already strove to sit next to him, because communication with him was amazing. No wonder George Lucas and St e nli Kubrick considered him a teacher.Professionals – who had a relationship with space – tended to have tremendous respect for it. The same Korolev – well, what are you talking about!

After all, it’s amazing: what Pavel Vladimirovich conceived and implemented, all these lunar rovers, all-terrain vehicles, cosmonaut suits, we then saw in life. He did not “rip off” them, copy them, but vice versa. This is a joke, of course, but there was such an impression. When he met with astronauts, they always wondered how everything was accurate in his films.His foresight, of course, was overwhelming. So the interest in it on the part of “Westerners” is understandable. It is very disappointing that we have underestimated it.

4. The Americans were so impressed by “Planet of Storms” that they arranged its illegal rental twice under different names

First time in 1965 – with the title “Journey to a Prehistoric Planet”. The film was completely re-dubbed, the names of Soviet filmmakers in the credits were replaced with fictitious English ones.The second version, “Journey to the Planet of Prehistoric Women” was published in 1968. Soviet cosmonauts again became American, for their adventures, scenes with half-naked Amazons were filmed and edited. Both times, the American viewer was confident that he was watching a movie made in the United States. According to Kharkevich, Klushantsev was aware, but reacted calmly:

– Yes, he knew, and, of course, was surprised and outraged. But he reacted with restraint, intelligently: “How so … well, how can it be? Well, this is shameless! “

5. The departure of Klushantsev was preceded by disagreements with the author of the most “memorial” scene from “Streets of Broken Lanterns”, filmed many years later

It was directed by Vitaly Aksyonov (in 1998-2008 he filmed several episodes of “Streets …”, including the scene where the cops sing “Call me with you” – her copies on YouTube have hundreds of thousands of views). In 1971 he became the director of Lennauchfilm.

– He did not have a relationship in 1971 with the new director of the studio, – says Kharkevich – Unfortunately, almost an open conflict.Vitaly Evgenievich was a complex person, he had his own idea of ​​popular science cinema. And Pavel Vladimirovich – his own. They came together “wall to wall”, and Pavel Vladimirovich left the studio, stopped cooperation.

Pavel Vladimirovich very painfully perceived the fact that “cosmic” cinema had gradually ceased to exist. When we shot “I See the Earth!”, I went to Moscow to get permission from the cosmonauts – without their “visa” the film could not be released on screens. I arrived, gave the censors a picture, editing sheets.The next day, when I came, I was met by some two people and said: “We ask you to remove the epigraph of your film.” And there was a statement by Korolev about astronautics. I say, “Why should we remove this?” – “Well, you know, now the attitude towards the Queen is being revised.” It was 1970. When I returned to Leningrad and told Pavel Vladimirovich about this, he was indignant, he was shaking, it was scary to look at him.

Pavel Vladimirovich believed that our future belongs to cosmic history.With relocations, with displacements, with the construction of a new life. He was, of course, a dreamer. On the one hand, a lyricist, and on the other, a brilliant engineer, technician and physicist. This, of course, was striking in him, the combination of romanticism with concreteness and technical literacy. I’m not just hoping, but for some reason I think that if the world does not destroy itself in the near future, and we can agree, then we will explore outer space – this is quite obvious. And Pavel Vladimirovich can sleep well, his dreams will come true.

6. Klushantsev revealed the secrets of his film tricks to the Oscar winner for special effects for Terminator 2

It was Robert Skotak – in the early 90s he specially came to Klushantsev to figure out how he was made films. What he learned, Skotak told in the Danish documentary “Star Dreamer” (2002). Its director Sonia Westerholt emigrated to Denmark from Leningrad in 1969. In the 90s, she again ended up in Russia, where she met with Klushantsev.

For the first time I heard about Pavel Vladimirovich in 1998, she told Fontanka. – My colleague and joint producer of my films from St. Petersburg, Viktor Bocharov, told me about it. I was struck by the biography of Klushantsev, and I remembered how as a child I saw his film “The Road to the Stars” (1957). He impressed me a lot. The fact is that our era, the sixties, was “bitten by space”. I have been living in Denmark for 50 years already – I left when no one else went anywhere.For me then leaving was like flying to Mars. Step into another world.

When I found out about Klushantsev, I asked if I could meet this person. I contacted his relatives, they said, of course, come, but Pavel Vladimirovich is already very old and contact with him is almost impossible. I said, “I’ll try.” The first thing that Klushantsev said when I arrived with the operator: “Forgive me, please, I speak very badly. I have no one to talk to. “It was an almost blind, motionless person. But with an absolutely clear head. We recorded a short interview, I went to Copenhagen and started looking for opportunities to make a film.

7. To shoot the first full-length documentary about Klushantsev, he needed to leave

The very first documentary about Klushantsev was the short “Pavel Klushantsev – To the Stars!” (2000) Alexandra Tkali. But the first “big” movie about the director was filmed in Denmark. True, the funds for the shooting were obtained only after the death of the protagonist.

Imagine that you are looking for money for a film about someone else’s aunt – no one knows who Pavel Klushantsev is, – complains Westerholt – Several months passed, they called me from St. Petersburg and said that Klushantsev had died. Then I told Bocharov: “Take the cameraman and film the funeral. I will pay for everything, find the money, most importantly, take it off. ” And he shot – remember, there are these shots in the film, as if a look from the sky? They have become a “calling card” – with them I began to go to international pitches, continuing to look for money for the film.It so happened that my movie about Klushantsev began with his funeral.

I was trying to get international funding for a film – this is a serious undertaking. Now, most of the big documentary projects are funded by the joint production of many countries, and then, twenty years ago, it was all very new. And the condition was for the first money to be allocated by the national television. Therefore, first of all, I had to interest the Danes. I had my own small film company, very young.Therefore, in order to somehow control the process, television offered me one of the editors as co-directors – therefore, all sources indicate that the film has two directors: me and Mads Baastrup. In fact, he really helped me a lot. We traveled to America together, he took a great part in the editing of the film.

8. In the archives of Sonya Westerholt there is a video interview of Klushantsev more than an hour long. It has not yet been made public

On YouTube you can find interviews with Klushantsev of different years, but they are all small.The existence of a long video conversation can be called a sensation for all connoisseurs of the director’s work.

– Viktor Bocharov played a huge role in the making of the film, – shares Sonya. – He provided a huge interview with Klushantsev, filmed on an amateur camera. Fragments from it are in the “Star Dreamer”. But not all of them.

I’m thinking about [making the materials public]. I am pleased to know that there is again interest in both Klushantsev and my film.

9. George Lucas wanted to show Star Dreamer in the United States. But I changed my mind

– When movie Star Dreamer came out, at some point I got an email from Industrial Light and Magic, recalls Sonya. “They asked me if I wanted to come and show them a film. I replied, “Fine, just pay for the ticket.” They write, “We usually don’t do that.”I thought, “Well, don’t.” And then time passed, and someone told me that this company belongs to George Lucas.

I don’t know [what is the reason]. Probably, the secretary wrote to me, who did not know that I was from Denmark, that it was not so easy for me to get to the USA. In general, it did not work out.

10. During the lockdown, the Danes signed up to watch a film about Klushantsev in the queue

– Last year, in the spring, when we were all experiencing a lockdown, I decided that I would do a film lecture at my home, – says Westerholt.- I decided to start with the “Star Dreamer” – showed, told about Klushantsev. The next day people started signing up at my house. And so for several months they came to see and hear about Pavel Vladimirovich. When the borders are open, I want to return to “Star Dreamer” again.

Unfortunately, to say that Klushantsev is popular in Denmark is a huge exaggeration. He has separate fans in every country. But the Danes who watched the film, Klushantsev is not as interesting as a director – more as an inventor, as a talented person with an amazing destiny.

Gleb Kolondo, specially for Fontanka.ru

Fontanka expresses gratitude to the former Lennauchfilm editor, Honored Cultural Worker of the Russian Federation Larisa Kukhaleva for advice and assistance in organizing interviews, as well as for the opportunity to shoot props from films by Pavel Klushantsev

Photo: PLANET STORM (1961) Photo: PLANET STORM (1961) 90,000 Alenichev about his “baggage”, kindness and place in history – RT in Russian

The main advantage of ending a career is a lot of free time …The famous Russian footballer Dmitry Alenichev stated this in an interview with the Small Tok program. According to him, he is the kindest father, which is why he often suffers, since his three children often sit on their necks. The specialist admitted that he was not against heading Krasnodar, and also noted that he would never work for Zenit or CSKA. The winner of the Champions League and the UEFA Cup told how he feels about the statements that Massimo Carrere has left the championship baggage at Spartak, and explained why he does not want to work as an expert on television.

“After unsuccessful matches, sometimes it came to fights”

– You seem to be a very balanced person. Can you remember your most daring act?

– Indeed, it is very difficult for me to unbalance. But, like any normal person and footballer, I am also not without drawbacks, therefore, actions with a minus sign took place on the field. Two come to mind. This is about the red cards that I received while performing overseas. The first was shown to me by Pierluigi Collina, when I played for the Italian Roma, for grappling with an opponent.Then, I confess, it was very embarrassing. I got the second at Porto. I disagreed with the judge’s decision, and he removed me. In both matches, there were no defeats, otherwise there would have been a large monetary fine.

– As a coach, have you ever swore that your boots were flying around the locker room?

– It happened, of course. Especially after bad matches. Somewhere I myself was wrong, somewhere – partners. This is in the order of things in football. Everyone could make claims to each other and talk in a raised voice.Sometimes it came to small fights. Not only boots flew, but also clothes, water bottles.

Also on the topic


Too old school: why Mourinho and Simeone risk being unemployed

Tottenham London and Atletico Madrid have completed their performances on the European stage in the 2020/21 season. Team head coaches …

Once, when I was already working as a head coach at Yenisei, I got angry too.After the first half, my team was losing with a score of 0: 3, I was extremely angry. Throwing balls all over the locker room. The guys, knowing my character, were surprised, because outwardly I am always calm. Unfortunately, that act of mine did not affect the course of the match in any way – in the second half we conceded two more (goals. – RT ).

– Were there any matches when you were shaken before entering the field?

– There were several of them. Just the Champions League final with Monaco in 2004. The decisive meeting of the UEFA Cup with Celtic a year earlier.And before the final matches of the Russian Cup, there was excitement, jitters. Fortunately, I have always coped with him, so I was lucky to win quite serious trophies with my partners.

– Which goal do you watch most often?

– Sounds immodest, but these are two goals that I was lucky enough to score in the European finals: Celtic in the UEFA Cup and Monaco in the Champions League. I can’t say that I often review them. This happens very rarely – maybe once every six months or when someone sends a video.This is the past, and you need to live in the present and the future.

– Who of all your teammates ate the most?

– Brazilian footballers at Porto. They loved to eat, especially raw meat. Deco and Derlei ate a lot. Jose Mourinho was not forbidden – all professionals. The main thing is that there is no excess weight.

– You are probably the most successful Russian footballer. Do you regret anything?

– I never regret anything in my life. It is not right. Perhaps, if he had regretted, he would not have reached such heights.Of course, there were mistakes that could have been avoided, but they probably only helped me eventually become a good footballer.

– What place would you give yourself in the list of the 100 best Russian footballers in history?

– The last one, because I had great partners both at Lokomotiv and Spartak. Plus, there were a lot of strong players in Russia, against whom I had a chance to play. So I will send myself to the last ten of this hundred.

– The three best RPL footballers right now?

– Nikola Vlasic is in the first place, Khvicha Kvaratskhelia is in second, and Mario Fernandez is in third. The naturalized Brazilian has been playing at a consistently high level for nine years. Quincy Promes, if he continues to act as in the last matches, will also fall into this three. The best goalkeeper? Of course, Igor Akinfeev.

– Can Sergey Pinyaev and Arsen Zakharyan become the new Alenichevs?

– They have everything for this.I would also name Kvaratskhelia. He plays very well at Rubin. Konstantin Tyukavin is not bad at Dynamo. These four are now considered the most promising in Russia. I wish them to reach their maximum here, and then follow in my footsteps and leave for stronger championships: Italy, Spain, England.

– Is there a footballer in the world who reminds you of yourself?

– On the invoice, probably Andreas Iniesta and Xavi. They are about the same height as me and have similar technique and game thinking.But by football standards, both, of course, are more skilled. I also always liked Zinedine Zidane, but he is still quite large.

“Mom and Dad couldn’t bring me home even for dinner”

– How much weight have you put on since you retired?

– Two kilograms. I graduated in 2006, and two years later I played a farewell match at the Lokomotiv stadium. The veterans of Real Madrid have arrived.I gathered my guys from Spartak, and we played with them – 4: 4. At that time, I weighed 70 kg, and now – 72. Although some of my partners have added both 10 kg and 15. Others, for example, Valera Karpin or Lyosha Smertin, on the contrary, lost weight. You look at the same Karpin on TV – and it seems that he has thrown off, keeps himself well in good shape.

– What is the main charm of life after the end of your career?

– There is a lot of free time. When I played football, I didn’t even have a chance to take a break.Constant moving, daily training, hotels. Therefore, after the end of his career, he felt unusual. I got into my head thoughts about what I should do, in what area to look for myself. It was a difficult period, but then I got used to it and began to enjoy life. I set myself the task of becoming a head coach and went to work in Tula.

Also on the topic


Sobolev’s fourth double, Maslov’s second own goal and Makhatadze’s beautiful ball: how Spartak beat Rostov in the RPL

Spartak beat Rostov on the road in the 24th round of the RPL.Valery Karpin’s wards allowed the opponent to open an account, but quickly …

– Why were your children born during the European Championships?

– Wow … I didn’t even think about that. It just happened with my wife. I’ll take a note. Moreover, our wedding took place on February 29th. We have to celebrate the anniversary every four years.

– Are you a kind dad or strict?

– The kindest. Sometimes I suffer from this, because the little ones immediately sit on Dad’s neck.And if dad was a little more serious, there would be no such sloppiness that is present in my children. Son Daniel loved the Lego constructor so much that he had to buy half of the store. But it is better than computers and smartphones. Everyone is sitting, they spoil their eyesight … When I was little, I didn’t have a phone, I went into the yard, where I played football from morning till night. Mom and Dad could not drag home even for dinner. They shouted out the window, but I didn’t go into any: football, football, football.

– What are you most proud of in life (not necessarily in football)?

– By their children.I am very glad that I have three of them: one daughter and two sons. This is happiness for every father.

– Fans lovingly call you Alen. What animal would you compare yourself to?

– It is clear why they called it that, since the surname is Alenichev. The deer is fast, but now my speed is not the same as when I was 20. Take a videotape and take a look. Then I ran about as fast as the deer.

– Which love is stronger – for a person or for football?

– Of course, to a person.Today there is football, but tomorrow it may not be, although I also love it very much. But, perhaps, the moment will come when I will say to myself: “That’s it, I’m tired of this football in my entire life.” And love for your family will never disappear, and this is the most important thing.

– Where would you like to meet old age?

– In Russia, at home. More precisely, in the suburbs, where I now live. And I was born in the small town of Velikiye Luki and came to Moscow to play football.

– What was the last book you read?

– I studied Italian at Roma, but when I finished my career I started to forget it.Honestly, the last book was just in Italian, in order to remember it a little.

– Who do you think is the best friend in the world of football?

– At the moment I have close relations with Yegor Titov, Andrey Tikhonov, Dmitry Parfyonov. With Jose Mourinho, we are now colleagues. I bow to Oleg Romantsev and Georgy Yartsev, who trained me at Spartak. I also note Fernando Santos, with whom I worked in Europe, and now he is the head of the Portuguese national team.

– Did you write anything to Mourinho after Tottenham left the Europa League?

– Jose and I have a very good relationship, we are almost always in touch. After the victories of his teams, I can write a message, or he will congratulate me on some holidays. Can you call us friends? Still, Mourinho is older. Rather good buddies. He is a wonderful person and coach who gave me a lot and won a huge number of trophies. Of course, after being defeated by Dynamo Zagreb, I decided not to bother him.I think there will be a more pleasant occasion to remind of myself.

“Thank you Carrera for this championship”

– What do you put in your suitcase when you go somewhere?

– If I go abroad, be sure to take a tennis racket. I must say right away that on vacation I try to do without football. I have enough of him in Moscow.

– What is “Alenichev’s luggage”?

– This is the suitcase that contained the entire uniform. And I left it to Massimo Carrere.Gathered there things, a racket.

– Is it sad that you did everything, but Carrera won?

– No. This means that it should have happened. The most important thing is that Spartak won. Yes, we prepared the team, but who worked before Massimo is a secondary issue. Results are at the fore in any sport, and Carrera must be thanked for this championship.

Also on the topic


“The club plays all-in, like in poker”: Yaroshik on the appointment of Olic as the head coach of CSKA, Chalov’s decline and failures in Europe

The appointment of Ivica Olic as head coach of CSKA came as a big surprise, as he had never had such experience before.About this in an interview …

– Why does Alexander Mostovoy not like Domenico Tedesco?

– You need to ask Sasha. Considering his statements, Mostovoy does not like not only Tedesco. He has some kind of jealousy for many coaches, and for football players too.

– Why CSKA Ivica Olic and why is he better than Sergei Ovchinnikov?

– It’s also difficult for me to say why the choice fell on the Croat. On the one hand, he showed himself great at CSKA and was one of the best legionnaires in the team.Therefore, to some extent, its appointment is natural and pleasant for the fans of the red and blue. On the other hand, Ivica has never worked as a head coach. But now it is difficult to judge, time must pass. Perhaps, in the remaining rounds of the RPL, the army team will show such results that the club recognizes Olic’s appointment as the correct move. In the meantime, this is a mystery to everyone.

– When will CSKA run out of Viktor Onopko’s “baggage”?

– I don’t think there was any baggage in this case. “Alenichev’s baggage” in “Spartak”, as the fans said, was probably present.

– To be the main in Krasnodar or an assistant in Spartak?

– Chief in Krasnodar. All teams go through hard times: Zenit, Spartak and CSKA. I have always liked southerners. They are a cute team with their own handwriting that showcases attacking football.

– In which RPL or FNL club would you find it most interesting to work?

– I would like to work with teams that set themselves serious tasks, if such proposals, of course, come.There are also such groups that are fighting for survival. This is always a serious stress for the coach. Now Rotor has changed the mentor. Yuri Baturenko came, for whom it will be very difficult to keep the Volgograd residents in the RPL. This is not for me.

– Under what condition would you agree to become a Zenit coach?

– I will definitely never work at Zenit.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *